Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:17:06 -0800
Karel Zak wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:33:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
virtually every partition table format contains a sector size
dependency
Is it true that "every partition table format"? I see in
fs/partitions/ that only ibm.c and msdos.c care about a sector size.
It seems that the others formats are based on 512 sectors only.
And do they do so correctly?
Looking at the UEFI spec for one, the GPT partition table format
definitely has a logical sector size dependency.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- ATA support for 4k sector size
- From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
- From: Martin K. Petersen
- Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
- From: Karel Zak
- ATA support for 4k sector size
- Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH] new irq tracer
- Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck updates for -tip
- Previous by thread: Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
- Next by thread: Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|