Re: Signal delivery order
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:13:16 +0100
On 03/16, Gábor Melis wrote:
In a nutshell, the context argument is wrong.
I strongly disagree. This all is correct and works as expected.
Yes, it doesn't match your expectations/needs, but this doesn't
mean it is wrong.
On Lunes 16 Marzo 2009, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 03/15, Gábor Melis wrote:
The revised signal-delivery-order.c (also attached) outputs:
test_handler=8048727
sigsegv_handler=804872c
eip: 8048727
esp: b7d94cb8
which shows that sigsegv_handler also has incorrect eip in the
context.
Why do you think it is not correct?
I didn't try your test-case, but I can't see where "esp: b7d94cb8"
comes from. But "eip: 8048727" looks exactly right, this is the
address of test_handler.
Sorry, I removed the printing of esp from the code as it was not
relevant to my point but pasted the output of a previous run.
Anyway, I think eip is incorrect in sigsegv because it's not pointing to
the instruction that caused the sigsegv. In general the ucontext is
wrong, because it's as if sigsegv_handler were invoked within
test_handler.
This is problematic if the sigsegv handler wants to do something with
the context. The real life sigsegv handler that's been failing does
this:
- skip the offending instruction by incrementing eip
I don't know how to solve your problem cleanly. Please let me now
if you find the solution ;)
As a workaround, perhaps sigsegv_handler() can just return if
uc_mcontext->ip points to another signal handler (assuming that
the first instruction of the signal handler can't cause the fault).
In this case the task will repeat the faulting instruction, and
sigsegv_handler() will be called again.
Agreed, this is not nice and the task should track sigaction()
calls, or sigsegv_handler() can do sigaction(signr, NULL, &oldact)
in a loop to see which handler we have.
Can the kernel help?
Perhaps we can add si_ip to _sigfault, in this case we could just
check uc_mcontext->ip != info->si_ip and return. Or we can unwind
the stack and find the "correct" rt_sigframe which matches the
page fault.
Or, we can change force_sig_info_fault() to block all signals
except si_signo and use set_restore_sigmask() logic. This means
no other signal can be dequeued until sigsegv_handler() returns.
I dunno. I am not sure your problem is common enough to do these
changes, but I can't judge.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Signal delivery order
- From: Chris Friesen
- Re: Signal delivery order
- References:
- Signal delivery order
- From: Gábor Melis
- Re: Signal delivery order
- From: Gábor Melis
- Re: Signal delivery order
- From: Oleg Nesterov
- Re: Signal delivery order
- From: Gábor Melis
- Signal delivery order
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 11/11] mmc: Add OpenFirmware bindings for SDHCI driver
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] DaVinci: MMC: MMC/SD controller driver for DaVinci/DM6446.
- Previous by thread: Re: Signal delivery order
- Next by thread: Re: Signal delivery order
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading