Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:23:23 +1000
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Greg KH<gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:05:38AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:12:08AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:55:04AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:You don't, that's why I said it's a heuristic. But basically, we have a
On 07/08/2009 09:52 AM, Peter Jones wrote:How can you ever know if all devices are enumerated as you don't know
On 07/08/2009 06:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:Actually, I take it back. We do mount usbfs, and we examine
I'm not quite sure if something in the F11 initrd needs usbfs forNot a thing.
something (cc'ed Peter)
/proc/bus/usb/devices as a heuristic to try and determine if
all the devices have been enumerated.
how many devices will be showing up?
timeout, and if the device list doesn't change in that amount of time, we
call it done.
It's not the best technique ever, but it does work.
Works for what? Why would you want to delay your boot process like
this?
Because otherwise when we actually get to mounting the root filesystem,
the device *isn't yet present*.
So this is your solution to the "root fs on usb device" problem? That's
odd that you chose this manner, as it still is not "correct" as has been
seen on different bug reports over the years on lkml.
Oh, okay. I can change it to use that then.So that could be related to what you're seeing.That file is now available in /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices if you
really need it.
But I would think that you do not.Well, we pretty much do until we switch to dracut.
What is dracut and why would it change this?
It's the replacement for mkinitrd, and it's using hotplug events for
this stuff instead.
Ah, good, yes, that is the correct solution.
As no other distro does this kind of waiting, I'm a bit confused as to
the need for it.
Good to know you pay attention to what's going on in the Linux world.
Oh, I do, I just don't think you are noticing us making distros now
without any initrd, or very stripped down ones, in order to achieve fast
boot times. Look at the moblin images from Intel, or the goblin images
from openSUSE to see that happening today.
So, back to the original problem here, is usbfs a requirement for Fedora
machines to boot properly? Or has that now been fixed in your repo?
We can't travel back in time even if we fix it in the repo, we have F10 and
F11 systems out there that people expect to use.
I would actually expect this initrd using usbfs predates all the hotplug stuff
we do it in RHEL5 also,its comes from a time when we had to make stuff
work with what was available at the time, I'd guess the wheel has been
reinvented 2-3 times in that era, however usbfs has always worked for us.
so when you guys said nobody uses this, you meant SuSE and Ubuntu
don't use this, not nobody.
So I don't think CONFIG_EMBEDDED is correct at least at this point.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Greg KH
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Jeff Chua
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- References:
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Dave Airlie
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Peter Jones
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Peter Jones
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Greg KH
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Peter Jones
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Greg KH
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Peter Jones
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- From: Greg KH
- Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Mactel-linux-users] touchpad synaptics pm-suspend
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 8)
- Previous by thread: Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- Next by thread: Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|