Re: [Announce] 2.6.31-rc4-rt1

From: koniu <gkusnierz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:09:39 +0100

Oh my, sent it with a wrong subject, sorry - the kernel in question i
2.6.31-rc4-rt1:

Hi,

I'm getting a bunch of BUGs, one from Xorg on startup and lots from
jackd. So far they don't seem to carry any ill-effects.

[ 15.323439] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:9
[ 15.323449] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 2462, name: Xorg
[ 15.323457] Pid: 2462, comm: Xorg Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ 15.323463] Call Trace:
[ 15.323478] [<c10262bf>] ? kmap+0x4f/0x60
[ 15.323530] [<f828f86f>] ? i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl+0x79f/0x8f0 [i915]
[ 15.323542] [<c10cec1e>] ? _slab_irq_disable+0x3e/0x60
[ 15.323592] [<f80c400f>] ? drm_gem_handle_create+0x6f/0x90 [drm]
[ 15.323602] [<c1294ac5>] ? rt_mutex_lock+0x15/0x50
[ 15.323646] [<f80c26fd>] ? drm_ioctl+0x15d/0x340 [drm]
[ 15.323687] [<f828f0d0>] ? i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl+0x0/0x8f0 [i915]
[ 15.323698] [<c116249f>] ? cpumask_any_but+0x1f/0x30
[ 15.323706] [<c102548c>] ? flush_tlb_page+0x5c/0xc0
[ 15.323713] [<c1024b02>] ? ptep_set_access_flags+0x42/0x60
[ 15.323721] [<c1294ac5>] ? rt_mutex_lock+0x15/0x50
[ 15.323730] [<c10664c6>] ? rt_down+0x16/0x50
[ 15.323751] [<c10e25af>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x7f/0x90
[ 15.323759] [<c10e2723>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x73/0x670
[ 15.323768] [<c10bcb5c>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x51c/0x730
[ 15.323778] [<c10d5339>] ? vfs_write+0x129/0x190
[ 15.323787] [<c10e2da4>] ? sys_ioctl+0x84/0x90
[ 15.323795] [<c1003a8c>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28

... (unrelated) ...

[ 68.633271] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3322
[ 68.633287] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 68.633295] Pid: 3322, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ 68.633301] Call Trace:
[ 68.633314] [<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ 68.633323] [<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 68.633335] [<c105ccc4>] ? getnstimeofday+0x54/0x110
[ 68.633344] [<c116af12>] ? copy_to_user+0x42/0x130
[ 68.633353] [<c1056220>] ? hrtimer_get_res+0x0/0x30
[ 68.633362] [<c10515a4>] ? sys_clock_gettime+0x54/0xc0
[ 68.633371] [<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19
[ 98.488299] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3321
[ 98.488315] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 98.488323] Pid: 3321, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ 98.488329] Call Trace:
[ 98.488341] [<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ 98.488351] [<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 98.488361] [<c1061089>] ? tick_program_event+0x39/0x50
[ 98.488371] [<c1040366>] ? wakeup_softirqd+0x16/0x60
[ 98.488381] [<c1088d44>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x14/0x90
[ 98.488389] [<c1041485>] ? irq_exit+0x35/0x80
[ 98.488398] [<c1017e83>] ? smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x53/0x80
[ 98.488408] [<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19
[ 108.743612] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3322
[ 108.743629] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 108.743637] Pid: 3322, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ 108.743643] Call Trace:
[ 108.743657] [<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ 108.743667] [<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 108.743678] [<c105ccc4>] ? getnstimeofday+0x54/0x110
[ 108.743687] [<c116af12>] ? copy_to_user+0x42/0x130
[ 108.743696] [<c1056220>] ? hrtimer_get_res+0x0/0x30
[ 108.743704] [<c10515a4>] ? sys_clock_gettime+0x54/0xc0
[ 108.743714] [<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19
[ 172.293274] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3322
[ 172.293292] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 172.293300] Pid: 3322, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ 172.293305] Call Trace:
[ 172.293318] [<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ 172.293328] [<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ 172.293340] [<c105ccc4>] ? getnstimeofday+0x54/0x110
[ 172.293349] [<c116af12>] ? copy_to_user+0x42/0x130
[ 172.293358] [<c1056220>] ? hrtimer_get_res+0x0/0x30
[ 172.293366] [<c10515a4>] ? sys_clock_gettime+0x54/0xc0
[ 172.293376] [<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19

... (more of the same) ...

Dunno if that means anything to you but if you need any more info
please CC me as I'm not subscribed.

Cheers,
koniu

Attachment: config
Description: Binary data

Prev by Date: RE: [RESEND PATCH] gianfar: keep vlan related state when restart
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based /dev
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RT 8/6] [ARM, WATCHDOG] davinci: include mach/timex.h in davinci_wdt.c
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][patch 10/12] move NTP adjusted clock multiplier to struct timekeeper
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

RE: They got me!!!
... Microsoft used to classify a whole bunch of IE bugs as "minor" ...
(Incidents)
=?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_Pinball_Hall_of_Fame_=96_the_Williams_Collection?= =?windows-1252?Q?_
... THe PS3 version has some bugs and mistakes. ... still enjoy all the games. ... There is a bunch of spots that they forgot to put textures on the 3d ... I have also sent the ball through objects a lot more than I ever did ...
(rec.games.pinball)
Re: Gnome KDE Xorg.conf
... drivers, I have couple of practical issues with them. ... bugs for Xorg. ... and buy some nice Intel one -- you get ...
(Fedora)
Re: i want audio and video drivers
... Debian-based distros have better package management and fewer weird bugs ... board has an ATi Radeon Xpress 200 soldered to it (which sucks; ... has much less buggy Linux support.) ... The man page for radeon in Xorg 7.1 ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)
Re: Will Planting Chrysanthemum Work?
... you have to wonder if planting a bunch of those ... it seems the Japanese beetle ... we use soap spray and bug-squashing. ... retardant for these bugs, for which reason they say to empty that bug ...
(rec.gardens.edible)