Re: postfix problems
From: NfoCipher (nfocipher_at_chickenware.com)
Date: 09/03/03
- Previous message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: problem with telnet on RH 9"
- In reply to: Marc Adler: "Re: postfix problems"
- Next in thread: Hal Burgiss: "Re: postfix problems"
- Reply: Hal Burgiss: "Re: postfix problems"
- Reply: Jason Dixon: "Re: postfix problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: redhat-list@redhat.com Date: 02 Sep 2003 20:44:24 -0500
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> I will, but I don't understand why running your own name server is bad.
> Could you explain that?
>
It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort. Mostly a matter
of opinion. The only time you need to secure a dns server is if your
port 53 tcp is open to the world. So you're gonna have the crowd that
will say, don't run it unless you just need to, and the other side that
says, it's there, it's useful, why not use it.
A personal caching dns server is harmless, and it comes setup like that
by default.
As for why its not affecting windows. More than likely it is, it just
times out faster before you really notice.
-- NfoCipher <nfocipher@chickenware.com> ChickenWare, LLC Co-lo or dedicated Linux box as low as $35/month - www.SpeedWorks.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: problem with telnet on RH 9"
- In reply to: Marc Adler: "Re: postfix problems"
- Next in thread: Hal Burgiss: "Re: postfix problems"
- Reply: Hal Burgiss: "Re: postfix problems"
- Reply: Jason Dixon: "Re: postfix problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|