RE: Router question (was Re: postfix problems)

From: Kenneth Goodwin (kgoodwin_at_datamarktech.com)
Date: 09/05/03

  • Next message: Graham Leggett: "DNS problems from the twilight zone"
    To: <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:00:19 -0400
    
    

    > > One question I have that came out of this discussion is
    > why are systems
    > > behind routers safer? What kind of security does a
    router provide?
    >
    > A router by itself does not provide any inherent
    security. However:
    >
    > A standard router, such as a cisco 2501, can do port
    > blocking, which can add
    > some security.
    >
    > The devices which are marketed as "cable modem routers"
    > often have Network
    > Address Translation (NAT), which *does* add some
    security.
    > It makes it
    > harder for the bad guys to hit your computer, as most of
    the
    > 'routers' are
    > set only to allow inbound packets that are replies to
    your outbound
    > requests. (IPtables does this as well, but most of these
    > 'routers' do it
    > out of the box).
    >
    > Ben

    Your best bet for a home setup is a true firewall/router and
    the ones for home,
    netgear, linksys, dlink for example
    are actually Linux boxes from what I understand. Standard
    routers, besides offering
    port blocking to keep out "well known port" based attacks,
    usually offer access control lists
    which enhance standard port blocks by allowing you to
    specify for all or any specific ports -
            allowed IP addresses (host or network or CIDR),
            Denied ip addresses (great for nailing known spammers from
    RBL's and stopping them
                            from annoying your mail servers and firewalls)

    Higher end routers (cisco 2600 and up) also offer enhanced
    firewall capabilities and
    tie ins with security servers.

    A commercial enterprise trying to protect it's internal
    assets would use a combination of devices each providing a
    level of defense. (Depends on it's access needs and Internet
    requirements)

    Level 1 - Border Router (with or without basic firewall)
            provides access control lists for specific port and/or ip
    address blocking or acceptance.
            provides first tier security through optional connection to
    security server
                    (dynamic access control lists, lock and key access
    controls (SecurID type systems)

            keeps the port scanners and known creeps from penetrating
    into the next level.

    Level 2 - True firewall, with/without content filtering and
    other security (IDS) servers
            Provides backup and further tuned access control lists
            provides intelligent access controls and attack detection
            Can tie to IDS servers, etc for increased intelligence

    Level 3 - Security servers
            Ties in with Border routers and Firewalls
            Can tie in with other servers
            Should have own local firewall enabled restricting all
    access
            to just encrypted port connections from known local hosts -
    firewalls and border routers.
            Provides increased intelligence for detecting attack
    profiles and intrsuion detection
            and response.

    Level 4 - Servers and desktops
            Personal level firewalls restricting access as appropriate.
            Antivirus, antispam, anti-spyware programs actively running
    on both client and server.
            Different manufacturers for each package - example -
                    Norton antivirus on the desktop, and Mcafee antivirus
    running on the email server.
            More than one anti-spyware package running as well.
            Servers restricted and tuned to a specific task - DNS
    server, email server, pop/imap server
            database server, email hub and scanning
    (antivirus/antispam)

    Level 4.1 - Web servers
            web servers should also be placed between two separate
    firewalls in true DMZ
            and preferrably on a different internet link. The outside
    firewall controls
            global access to your web farm, the inside firewall
    restricts access to just the
            specific porst and ip addresses of your web farm. All
    servers in the web farm
            shoudl also have local firewalls and IDS software.

    This is sort of "the Embassy Defense System" - put as many
    obstacles of increasing difficulty
    between you and your attackers to give you time to detect
    and curtail them before they can do
    significant damage to your infrastructure.

    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Graham Leggett: "DNS problems from the twilight zone"

    Relevant Pages