RE: I can't boot Windows XP with Grub loader.

From: Rene Enriquez (shyfire_at_azrael.caltech.edu)
Date: 09/30/03

  • Next message: Jason Dixon: "Re: OT: DNS"
    To: <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:42:29 -0700
    
    

    -----Original Message-----
    From: redhat-list-admin@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-admin@redhat.com]
    On Behalf Of Edward Croft
    Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:48 AM
    To: Red Hat List
    Subject: RE: I can't boot Windows XP with Grub loader.

    On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:37, Otto Haliburton wrote:
    > You are saying here that if it was the C:\ drive(confusing). I think
    that
    > win98, winME etc. aren't able to configure with any drive letter other
    than
    > c, but winNT and win2k can. I don't know that winXP can so I hope
    that what
    > you are saying is true.
    >
    Let me clarify. When I first had this box, it was a Win98 box that was
    upgraded to a Win2k box. When I decided that I wanted Linux on the
    system, rather than try to fiddle more room out of the current drive, I
    used a spare hard drive I had. I installed that as the primary and the
    Windows drive as the slave. Then in grub.conf, I used the map command so
    that Windows would still think it was the C: drive. Another option was
    to edit the c:\boot.ini file on Win2k and make changes to the drive and
    partition info, but this was much easier. I also had set aside a small
    partition on the slave for FAT. This way, I can mount the FAT drive from
    either the Linux side or the Win2k side. This allows for moving files
    between the systems since Linux can't write to an NTFS mounted
    filesystem. (Supposedly, you can make changes in the kernel to allow for
    NTFS mounts read-only, but why bother if you can't write.)

    My second system was a little easier as it was a fresh system that I
    built. I bought a large hard drive and split the drive between the
    systems and installed XP first. Since they are both on the same drive,
    no issues with the mapping.

    Just a little helpful hint, from your Uncle Ed!

    -------
    this method works for me...boot.ini is to confusing for me

    title Windows XP
    map (hd0) (hd1)
    map (hd1) (hd0)
    rootnoverify(hd1,0)
    chainloader +1

    -rene

    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Jason Dixon: "Re: OT: DNS"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Windows XP Only
      ... Windows, in much the same way as its Windows NT predecessors, but then ... Win2k is basically WinXP ... No think he is saying that Windows NT begat both Windows XP and Windows ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic)
    • Re: Is Windows XP slower than 2000?
      ... >The more you use Windows XP, ... >Description of the Disk Cleanup Tool in Windows XP ... *** NT4 vs Win2k ... in memory. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
    • Re: Connecting to the Internet
      ... > APIs was a lot easier than learning Registry APIs.) ... be installed in all versions of Windows that you choose to support. ... I hope you don't mind me saying you have "missed the boat". ... Vague questions such as that are often ignored in Microsoft newsgroups ...
      (microsoft.public.vb.winapi)
    • Re: Windows Procedural Programming
      ... > One minute [Alf is] saying that a Windows program does not have a WinMain ...
      (comp.programming)
    • RE: [Full-Disclosure] lame bitching about xpsp2
      ... truly think you are saying something that can help. ... *nix way) you still would whine because they are also working on extending ... are concerned that you will have to learn Windows, ... I recall nimda and I don't recall my Windows machines getting infected even ...
      (Full-Disclosure)