Re: RH 8 or 9 for production environment

From: Saqib Ali (saqib_at_seagate.com)
Date: 10/01/03

  • Next message: Mario Camuņas: "kswapd" 
    To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:14:19 -0700 (PDT)

    I have been using RH 9.0 with Apache 2.x. Worx without any issue. However
    I compiled my own apache build, with the module that I needed.

    and i have all the services that you listed. no issues with RH 9.0

    If you want to spend money and get support go for RH 2.1 ES. I have been
    running that for a while, with no issues at all. Apache 2.x on RH 2.1 ES
    as well.

    Saqib Ali
    ---------
    http://www.xml-dev.com

    On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Mike McMullen wrote:

    > Hi all,
    >
    > I have a need to upgrade to Apache 2.0. From searching the
    > archives and googling it appears that the easiest thing to do
    > from a production environment view is to upgrade to a later
    > release than 7.3.
    >
    > Unless I am missing some easy way to install Apache 2.0 and
    > still maintain a system that can be kept up to date with up2date.
    >
    > What version of RH are people recommending for production
    > systems that aren't 7.3?
    >
    > My key services are:
    >
    > web
    > imap
    > sendmail
    > samba
    > ssh
    > DNS
    >
    > Any help appreciated,
    >
    > Mike
    >
    >
    > --
    > redhat-list mailing list
    > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    > 

    -- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  • Next message: Mario Camuņas: "kswapd"

    Relevant Pages

    • RH 8 or 9 for production environment
      ... I have a need to upgrade to Apache 2.0. ... archives and googling it appears that the easiest thing to do ... from a production environment view is to upgrade to a later ...
      (RedHat)
    • apt-get upgrade - excessive list?
      ... u upgrade php4", I get an humbungous list of stuff to update. ... something I can't really do on a production server on a whim. ... The following packages will be REMOVED: analog apache apache-common ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: port update problem - newbie
      ... >> update the port as soon as it is changed. ... >> wait until the package has been built and moved to ... > 1) I think that if I upgrade a port, ... > and apache needs to be upgraded. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Version compatibility: Linux, Apache, Tomcat
      ... Linux: 2.4.9-e.25 ... Apache HTTP server: 1.3.27 ... Would there be any problems with Tomcat and Apache? ... Apache (you may want to upgrade for security patches, ...
      (comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix)
    • Re: RH 8 or 9 for production environment
      ... > I have a need to upgrade to Apache 2.0. ... > from a production environment view is to upgrade to ... > Unless I am missing some easy way to install Apache ... from Red Hat 8, ...
      (RedHat)