Re: RH 8 or 9 for production environment
From: Saqib Ali (saqib_at_seagate.com)
To: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
I have been using RH 9.0 with Apache 2.x. Worx without any issue. However
I compiled my own apache build, with the module that I needed.
and i have all the services that you listed. no issues with RH 9.0
If you want to spend money and get support go for RH 2.1 ES. I have been
running that for a while, with no issues at all. Apache 2.x on RH 2.1 ES
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Mike McMullen wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a need to upgrade to Apache 2.0. From searching the
> archives and googling it appears that the easiest thing to do
> from a production environment view is to upgrade to a later
> release than 7.3.
> Unless I am missing some easy way to install Apache 2.0 and
> still maintain a system that can be kept up to date with up2date.
> What version of RH are people recommending for production
> systems that aren't 7.3?
> My key services are:
> Any help appreciated,
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list