Re: Remote Desktops

From: Gary Stainburn (gary.stainburn_at_ringways.co.uk)
Date: 10/24/03

  • Next message: Cannon, Andrew: "RE: Remote Desktops"
    To: redhat-list@redhat.com, "Wade Chandler" <wchandler@redesetgrow.com>
    Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:59:49 +0100
    
    

    On Friday 24 Oct 2003 4:39 am, Wade Chandler wrote:
    > You could purchase a (not cheap) Xserver for windows called X-Win32 and
    > use X over ssh. This works very well. I do this. You need a fast
    > connection if you do this over the internet though. Play with ssh
    > compression on and off. If you want a cheaper solution you could setup
    > Cygwin on the Windows box. Not sure how well it will work. I haven't
    > played around much with X in cygwin. X-Win32 works really well, however
    > to me it is a little expensive. But, it is the best X Server I have
    > seen for Windows yet. You won't have a remote desktop either. But,
    > what you will be able to do is run the remote graphical applications. I
    > used this more than VNC or remote desktops. The apps appear to run
    > right on your Windows machine (except for saving and editing files for
    > course).
    >
    > Wade

    Another good thing about X-Win32 is that it is try-before-you-buy (which I
    subsequently did)

    http://www.starnet.com/products/downloads.asp

    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: redhat-list-admin@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-admin@redhat.com]
    > On Behalf Of Ding Li
    > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:05 PM
    > To: redhat-list@redhat.com
    > Subject: Re: Remote Desktops
    >
    >
    > Then try vnc. I used vnc to connect to linux before. The bad thing is
    > you get another desktop which is not the local one. Another bad thing
    > about vnc is it's slow. Sometimes you have to refresh manually.
    >
    > cs@zip.com.au wrote:
    > >On 14:04 23 Oct 2003, Ding Li <achillis2002@netscape.net> wrote:
    > >| Try rdesktop. I'm using it, pretty cool. Much faster than vnc.
    > >
    > >It goes the wrong way. It's fine for accessing the Windows machine from
    > >
    > >the linux box. However he wants to access a Linux desktop from the
    > >Windows machine.

    -- 
    Gary Stainburn
     
    This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
    may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
    and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000     
    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Cannon, Andrew: "RE: Remote Desktops"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Is VNC safe for remote control?
      ... VPN and Remote Desktop? ... > our security personnel... ... > I cannot help thinking about using VNC instead of RADMIN. ... Using SSH? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Is VNC safe for remote control?
      ... VPN and Remote Desktop? ... > our security personnel... ... > I cannot help thinking about using VNC instead of RADMIN. ... Using SSH? ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
    • Re: Remote access PC support
      ... If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is ... >>you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC. ... > I do for those unfortunate times I stuck on a windows machine ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Is VNC safe for remote control?
      ... > No its not safe, ... > not absolutely secure but significantly better than VNC in every respect. ... Using SSH? ... How about the remoteassistance and remote desktop in WINDOWXP then? ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
    • Re: Is VNC safe for remote control?
      ... > No its not safe, ... > not absolutely secure but significantly better than VNC in every respect. ... Using SSH? ... How about the remoteassistance and remote desktop in WINDOWXP then? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)