Re: Weird Ports Showing for XINETD
From: Brett Franck (bfranck_at_perfectnetusa.com)
Date: 10/29/03
- Previous message: John H. Clark, III: "Remote X11 Gnome Session via SSH"
- In reply to: Rigler, Steve: "RE: Weird Ports Showing for XINETD"
- Next in thread: Brett Franck: "Re: Weird Ports Showing for XINETD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <redhat-list@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:18:29 -0600
Steve,
Thanks for your reply, but I have a question. SGI_FAM is started through
xinetd, yes, but the file indicates that it's a TCP protocol....my open port
is UDP. Are you sure we're talking aobut the same animal??
Brett
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rigler, Steve" <SRigler@MarathonOil.com>
To: <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: Weird Ports Showing for XINETD
> There was a thread about this a while back. The culprit
> was sgi_fam. The general consensus seemed to be to leave
> it running.
>
> -Steve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: redhat-list-admin@redhat.com
> > [mailto:redhat-list-admin@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Brett Franck
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:18 PM
> > To: redhat-list@redhat.com
> > Subject: Weird Ports Showing for XINETD
> >
> >
> > REPOST Without HTML junk......sry bout the HTML
> > postings.......maybe someone
> > has an answer to my ques?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Okay since I last wrote about messing up my server with a Chroot jail,
> > things have definately changed.
> >
> > I installed RH9 and put it on an IBM Netvista 866 w/384Mg Ram
> > /proc/kcore
> > shows 401477632 Oct 28 11:53 /proc/kcore..... Vs RH8.0 on a junker 450
> > w/320Mg Ram
> >
> > All is running well but I do have one question.....maybe it
> > was this way in
> > RH 8.0, I never noticed, but I'm pretty sure I would have
> > noticed an open
> > errant port not assigned to anything.
> >
> > netstat -taup shows a UDP port open by XINETD (BY the way,
> > I"m not running
> > anything with xinetd).......I first noticed it because the
> > CHKROOTKIT bawled
> > out an alert when the XINETD port was running on 1008 ... now it's on
> > 923....has been on 979.....etc.....moves when I restart
> > Xinetd.....is this
> > the result of running xinetd as xinetd -stayalive -pidfile
> > /var/run/xinetd.pid
> > thus keeping a UDP port open to support the PID?????
> >
> > Brett
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: John H. Clark, III: "Remote X11 Gnome Session via SSH"
- In reply to: Rigler, Steve: "RE: Weird Ports Showing for XINETD"
- Next in thread: Brett Franck: "Re: Weird Ports Showing for XINETD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|