Firewall: Thoroughly Confused
From: David C. Hart (DCH_at_TQMcube.com)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Robert Walk: "SATA - Intel D865PERLL"
- Next in thread: Matthew Galgoci: "Re: Firewall: Thoroughly Confused"
- Reply: Matthew Galgoci: "Re: Firewall: Thoroughly Confused"
- Reply: MKlinke: "Re: Firewall: Thoroughly Confused"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Redhat General List <redhat-list@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:03:22 -0500
We could not receive mail from the Hormel (Redhat List) server. We were
receiving the rest of our mail without a problem.
Our server has three internal IPs on two interfaces; eth0, eth0:1, eth1.
The router sent (NAT'd) services to the appropriate IP. Anything that
wasn't NAT'd was sent to eth0:1 where the packets were logged and then
rejected by IPTables. This was done exclusively through FILTER/INPUT.
There were NO - zero - other rules in the firewall.
Now here's the weird part. Packets from Hormel - and ONLY Hormel - were
mangled. They showed up as UDP instead of TCP and then were assigned to
an array of ports - none being 25.
As soon as I stopped IPTables, the problem went away which means that
there is no problem on the router end. Moreover, how could this possibly
pertain ONLY to the Hormel server.
Does anyone have any ideas?
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Robert Walk: "SATA - Intel D865PERLL"
- Next in thread: Matthew Galgoci: "Re: Firewall: Thoroughly Confused"
- Reply: Matthew Galgoci: "Re: Firewall: Thoroughly Confused"
- Reply: MKlinke: "Re: Firewall: Thoroughly Confused"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]