Re: Is Secondary IDE always slower than primary?
From: Reuben D. Budiardja (techlist_at_voyager.phys.utk.edu)
Date: 12/02/03
- Previous message: QVanaclocha_Lloren=E7=2C_Lloren=E7_=5BINSA=5D=22?=: "kernel exploit - userland can access linux kernel memory -"
- In reply to: Edward Dekkers: "Re: Is Secondary IDE always slower than primary?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: redhat-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:34:19 -0500
On Monday 01 December 2003 08:32 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
<snip>
> >>And a side note to that - make sure the big difference you're seeing is
> >>not because the 80Gb is a JB model and the 120 a BB model.
> >
> > Uhhm..would you care to elaborate what JB / BB means?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> The BB models from Western Digital have a 2Mb cache on the hard drive.
> The JB models have 8Mb cache. Pitting one model against the other will
> yield a large difference in results, with the JBs being a lot faster.
Oh OK. Both of them is actually 8MB cache, since I made sure I picked those
8MB cache hard drive. I just didn't pay attention to the model number
(JB/BB).
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
---------------------------------------------------------
"To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy
something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy
Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional
side effect."
- Linus Torvalds -
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: QVanaclocha_Lloren=E7=2C_Lloren=E7_=5BINSA=5D=22?=: "kernel exploit - userland can access linux kernel memory -"
- In reply to: Edward Dekkers: "Re: Is Secondary IDE always slower than primary?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
