Re: Security Issues....

From: Reuben D. Budiardja (techlist_at_voyager.phys.utk.edu)
Date: 12/05/03

  • Next message: Mike Vanecek: "Re: Up2date Net-SNMP 5.0.9 breaks linksysmon 1.1.2"
    To: redhat-list@redhat.com
    Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:21:34 -0500
    
    

    On Thursday 04 December 2003 11:11 pm, bruce wrote:
    > Thanks...
    >
    > But we're looking for more than just being able to access the machines in a
    > secure fashion...
    >
    > We're looking for what has to be done to set up a secure environment for a
    > development process.

    What do you mean by "secure" exactly?

    By default, a user will only have write access to his/her home directory. Of
    course the user can execute command in other places (like /usr/bin /bin, etc)
    if setup correctly by root. So if each user just need to develop stuff in
    his/her home directory, you already have that just by Redhat installation.

    RDB

    > -Bruce
    > bedouglas@earthlink.net
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: redhat-list-admin@redhat.com
    > [mailto:redhat-list-admin@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Michael Burger
    > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:54 PM
    > To: redhat-list@redhat.com
    > Subject: Re: Security Issues....
    >
    >
    > http://www.openssh.org/ if you want shell access
    >
    > Mike
    >
    > On Thursday 04 December 2003 10:09 pm, bruce wrote:
    > > Hi..
    > >
    > > I'm relatively new to Linux, but I have a few questions concerning
    > > security. If there is a better/more appropriate site, I'd appreciate
    > > being pointed in that direction...
    > >
    > > I'm looking at setting up a few machines to allow users to access the
    > > machines and perform development work on the machines. By development, I
    > > mean the ability to actually run various scripting languages
    > > (Perl/PHP/etc...) and the ability to actually build/compile/run their
    >
    > C/C++
    >
    > > apps....
    > >
    > > My question has to do with the problem of creating an environment that's
    > > reasonably secure. Is there a way/ways to create this kind of environment
    > > such that a user can essentially have his/her own space and not somehow
    > > screw up the system. Are there pointers that you can provide to give me a
    > > better high level understanding of what this kind of environment would
    > > entail...
    > >
    > > I've done the Google thing but I have a lot more questions...
    > >
    > > Thanks in advance for any help/assistance with this issue...
    > >
    > > Hey... If you live close to me, I'd even buy you lunch!!!
    > >
    > > Thanks
    > >
    > > Bruce Douglas
    > > bedouglas@earthlink.net
    > > (925) 866-2790

    -- 
    Reuben D. Budiardja
    Department of Physics and Astronomy
    The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    "To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy 
    something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy 
    Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional 
    side effect."
                     - Linus Torvalds -
    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Mike Vanecek: "Re: Up2date Net-SNMP 5.0.9 breaks linksysmon 1.1.2"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Security Issues....
      ... secure fashion... ... > I'm looking at setting up a few machines to allow users to access the ... > My question has to do with the problem of creating an environment that's ... unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: SSHD revelaing too much information.
      ... hundreds of machines and really don't see this as a problem. ... The 'green' banner does not attract any ... This goes against my security ... > networks) then make sure you're running a known secure version. ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • xp firewall problem.
      ... been unable to access any secure web pages at all. ... I do not have norton on any of my machines and have tried ... is the same with the firewall enabled or disabled. ... and disabling standard Microsoft firewall...still no ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Biometrics
      ... keeping them disconnected and physically secure is sage advice. ... great grasp of the security aspect of protecting computers. ... Use Windows 98 Second Edition Machines as a safety internal protocol ... Maintain certain machines as off-line only in locked and secure rooms ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Wintards say Vista & XP Security is better than OS X while millions of bots spam the planet
      ... Many of those machines are kept up by people that don't know how to secure their machines. ... Microsoft should have taken things like this in to account and tried to work at thinking about security first but features always sell mass consumer products. ... But some people, including some found in this forum, recommend staying away from Vista citing UAC annoyance as one of the reasons. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)

    Loading