Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2
From: John Nichel (jnichel_at_by-tor.com)
Date: 12/09/03
- Previous message: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- In reply to: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- Next in thread: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- Reply: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: redhat-list@redhat.com Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:17:30 -0600
Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 19:57, L. Christopher Luther wrote:
>
>
>>So what I'm trying to find out is whether the Apache/PHP packages as
>>distributed with RH 8.0 are "experimental" or whether they are indeed
>>release-level packages. Does anyone out there in Redhat-List land know
>>anything about this?
>
>
> You've basically answered your own question. If Red Hat releases them
> with their official 8.0 distribution, what makes this company deem them
> as "experimental"?
>
> Note that I'm not validating the quality of said versions, I'm simply
> curious as to how this company comes to grade them as such.
>
But the PHP group strongly recommends that you do NOT use any version of
PHP with Apache2 in a production enviroment. They recommend that you
stick with the 1.3.x versions of Apache.
-- By-Tor.com It's all about the Rush http://www.by-tor.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- In reply to: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- Next in thread: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- Reply: Jason Dixon: "Re: Apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]