RE: limit maxproc
From: Rigler, Steve (SRigler_at_MarathonOil.com)
Date: 01/07/04
- Previous message: Larry Brown: "samba printserver"
- Maybe in reply to: rachid boukhari: "limit maxproc"
- Next in thread: Sean Estabrooks: "Re: limit maxproc"
- Reply: Sean Estabrooks: "Re: limit maxproc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <redhat-list@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:43:22 -0600
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-admin@redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-admin@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Sean Estabrooks
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:33 PM
> To: redhat-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: limit maxproc
>
>
> So to answer your question, hard limits are not increased with
> limits.conf. Its primary purpose is to set initial limit values when
> none have yet been set.
>
It looks like there is a relationship between hardware and the
nproc/maxproc value.
Looking on two dual-cpu machines I found that they were both 7168.
The 4 single cpu machines I've looked at are all different: 20479,
2559, 4087, and 1023.
I'm not sure why the one single cpu machine would have such a high
number...
Maybe this answers the OP's question...it varies from machine to machine.
-- S C Rigler RHCE #803003335409754 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: Larry Brown: "samba printserver"
- Maybe in reply to: rachid boukhari: "limit maxproc"
- Next in thread: Sean Estabrooks: "Re: limit maxproc"
- Reply: Sean Estabrooks: "Re: limit maxproc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]