RE: Iptables-restore

From: Robert Denton (Robert_at_headsprout.com)
Date: 01/19/04

  • Next message: Jody Cleveland: "RE: What is my boot device?"
    To: "'redhat-list@redhat.com'" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:21:06 -0800
    
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:ms-nospam-0306@arcor.de]
    > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 2:32 PM
    > To: redhat-list@redhat.com
    > Subject: Re: Iptables-restore
    >
    >
    > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:08:40 -0800, Robert Denton wrote:
    >
    > > Okay, rpm -V lokkit gets the same result. It claims that package
    > > lokkit is not installed, however, simply typing lokkit at
    > the command
    > > line launches lokkit 0.50. What do you think I should do?
    >
    > First you should consider replying _below_ quotes, because
    > that makes it easier to follow multiple threads at once and
    > increases the likelihood that more knowledgable people read
    > your messages.
    >
    > Seems your RPM database is broken when packages such as
    > iptables and lokkit cannot be found in it. Try querying it a
    > bit, e.g. with
    >
    > rpm --query --all --last | less
    >
    > Also have a look into /var/lib/rpm. If the "Packages" file
    > and other files within are not several Megabytes huge, you
    > may have killed your RPM database somehow.
    >
    > --
    >

    Okay. I figured out what was happening with this. As it turns out I
    recently added a line to the kickstart postscript section in which I
    lowercase everything within the webroot with a batch file that I created.
    The line was like this:

    /bin/lcase.batch -R /var/www/webroot

    But I don't understand why this could affact iptables. I use -R because
    there are several directories within the webroot I need to lowercase.
    However, when I changed the line to this:

    /bin/lcase.batch /var/www/webroot/samples
    /bin/lcase.batch /var/www/webroot/graphics
    /bin/lcase.batch /var/www/webroot/audio

    I still had the problem I described earlier with iptables not working. What
    is happening here? Why is _everything_ being lowercased (with or without
    the -R)? Thanks. R.

    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Jody Cleveland: "RE: What is my boot device?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Question about iptables in edgy
      ... does the iptables file configure the ... I don't really need a firewall, and lokkit ... and it loads every time ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: Question about iptables in edgy
      ... does the iptables file configure the ... I don't really need a firewall, and lokkit ... and it loads every time ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • iptables question: no chain/target/match by that name...
      ... The lokkit question yesterday by Faheem Mitha prompted me to install ... Then upon boot lokkit in /etc/init.d executes that script. ... you have to dig into iptables. ... No chain/target/match by that name ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: need help w/RH9 firewall setup
      ... >> I assume it's Lokkit. ... The -m udp looks wrong, so if that's what you put ... I tried the iptables MAN, and to be honest, most of it went over my ...
      (comp.os.linux.networking)
    • Re: Redhat default firewall is now iptables
      ... Greg T wrote: ... > iptables rather than ipchains by default. ... > the firewall tool lokkit, or the GUI version GNOME-lokkit, the options ... > you select will be written to an iptables configuration. ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)