RE: Changing owners recursively
From: Ben Yau (byau_at_cardcommerce.com)
To: <email@example.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:01:56 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Cameron Simpson
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:48 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Changing owners recursively
> On 13:50 28 Jan 2004, Ben Yau <email@example.com> wrote:
> | Turn the group sticky bit on for all the directories.
> Nomenclature: it's _not_ the sticky bit! It's the setgid bit.
> The sticky bit is the last one!
Apologies. At my first job to make things easier (it worked for us at the
time) we always called it:
"user sticky" (set uid, u+s)
"group sticky" (set gid, g+s)
"other sticky" (sticky, o+s)
Thanks for the quick correction ! And it is a bad habit of mine to
continue to use the wrong nomenclature :) Thanks for the reminder!
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list