Re: support for controller and Serial ATA
From: Rodolfo J. Paiz (rpaiz_at_simpaticus.com)
Date: 02/19/04
- Previous message: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: support for controller and Serial ATA"
- In reply to: Edward Dekkers: "Re: support for controller and Serial ATA"
- Next in thread: Reuben D. Budiardja: "Re: support for controller and Serial ATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: redhat-list@redhat.com Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:17:20 -0600
At 23:40 2/18/2004, you wrote:
>Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
>
>>Another thing I'm considering is to use Serial ATA card and Serial ATA
>>drives instead, because they're faster.
>
>Is this true? I've never seen anything beat Ultra 320 SCSI with 15K drives
>in striped RAID.
>
>IS SATA faster? If so I need to adjust my train of thinking is all.
You need to adjust your frame of reference. 7200rpm consumer-type drives,
regardless of interface, are not going to be faster than the
state-of-the-art in server or workstation-class disks at DOUBLE the
rotation rate.
Speaking of interfaces, I would expect SATA to eventually scale beyond SCSI
but at this point the first version of SATA is slower than U320, I think.
-- Rodolfo J. Paiz rpaiz@simpaticus.com http://www.simpaticus.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: Rodolfo J. Paiz: "Re: support for controller and Serial ATA"
- In reply to: Edward Dekkers: "Re: support for controller and Serial ATA"
- Next in thread: Reuben D. Budiardja: "Re: support for controller and Serial ATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|