RE: Apache 2.0.x on ES 2.1

From: Hamilton, Andrew (Andrew.Hamilton_at_afccc.af.mil)
Date: 05/26/04

  • Next message: Gary Stainburn: "Re: network time settings - was Re: Decrypt Passwords" 
    To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 09:09:55 -0400

    I never use a canned version of apache from Red Hat. I think more important
    than trying to use a default version is to figure out what you really want
    the web server to do and compile it yourself. That way you get the options
    that YOU want not what someone else thinks you want. Apache is NOT
    difficult to compile. If you want an rpm you can get the source rpm then
    just use the spec file, modify it to get the options you want then build
    the rpm. I'm not sure it's worth the effort if you are only doing it for
    one machine, but some folks like having the rpm's so that it's part of rpm
    system for updates and such.

    regards,

    Drew

    -----Original Message-----
    From: boesigerc@post.ch [mailto:boesigerc@post.ch]
    Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:32 AM
    To: redhat-list@redhat.com
    Subject: Apache 2.0.x on ES 2.1

    Hello

    We like to migrate two Reverse Proxies from Sun Solaris to RedHat Linux.
    Unfortunately there is RedHat ES 2.1 running and the Reverse Proxy
    Application Module is written for Apache 2.0. Therefore we are
    challanged to install Apache 2.0.x on a ES 2.1 System. My favorit would
    be to simply install a binary version using rpm. Does offically such a
    Version exist? If not, does somebody know the configure arguments used
    to compile apache on ES 3.0 for example, so I can compile the server as
    close to the official version as possible?

    Any help appreciated.

    Regards,

    Cedric Boesiger 

    -- 
Die Schweizerische Post
PostFinance
Informatik
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



    -- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  • Next message: Gary Stainburn: "Re: network time settings - was Re: Decrypt Passwords"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: More about installing Apache2 in SuSE 9.1 Personal
      ... Make your personal the FTP version and install ... >> the Apache that comes with 9.1. ... apt-get for SUSE uses rpm, so removing a package is just "rpm -e ... Only use base and security repositories ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • RE: redhat-config-httpd question
      ... You might look at rpmbuild. ... if the spec file is created properly. ... > apache instances than the file locations. ... > Another disadvantage to rpm for me is that I have other non-rpm boxes ...
      (RedHat)
    • Simple HowTo
      ... Initially I asked if there was a simple HowTo for Apache HTTPD, ... Tomcat, Sun Java, and mod_jk. ... of the better installations defined specific file systems and mount ... is no RPM for it - are you saying I shouldn't use it? ...
      (Fedora)
    • [4.4.1] Compile libphp4.so from src w/o apache src?
      ... I was running php 4.1.2 that came with my Linux distro a while ... how can I compile a libphp4.so for use with my apache. ... (it was made available as an RPM when I obtained it some time ago, ...
      (comp.lang.php)
    • Re: [SLE] What package provides the default SuSE index.html for apache?
      ... But now that I removed the apache examples RPM there is ... It's got to be one of the SuSE help rmps. ... you can use midnight commander to browse an rpm and extract a single ...
      (SuSE)