Re: kernel compile error

From: Alex (linux_at_hostingcenter.ro)
Date: 06/24/04

  • Next message: Reuben D. Budiardja: "load testing suggestion"
    To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:23:39 +0300
    
    

    I don't have anything overclocked, byut I get this message in my logs a
    couple times a day:

    MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable incident occurred on CPU
    0.
    Bank 2: 940040000000017a

    I can't run a check because it's a critical server. If that dies, the hole
    network dies. It's true, when I trie to compile a kernel it segfaults, even
    when I try to compile 2.6.5 which is what I'm running right now.

    Maybe you can give a hint on what that message means before I proceed any
    further?
    Everything else seems ok, it runs ok, nothing crashes, only when I compile.

    Thanks!

    Alex Iruc

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts@ewilts.org>
    To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 2:40 PM
    Subject: Re: kernel compile error

    > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 08:30:52AM +0300, Alex wrote:
    > > Every time I try to compile kernel 2.6.7 (vanilla sources) on rh9 I get
    > > segmentation fault.
    > > Apparently it doesn't break every time in the same place, but the error
    is
    > > the same.
    >
    > It looks like you have a hardware problem. If you try two compiles in a
    > row and they fail in different places, it's not software.
    >
    > Run a full hardware error check with emphasis on memory. If you have
    > overclocked anything, clock it back to normal and hope you haven't
    > killed the hardware already.
    >
    > --
    > Ed Wilts, RHCE
    > Mounds View, MN, USA
    > mailto:ewilts@ewilts.org
    > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
    >
    >
    > --
    > redhat-list mailing list
    > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    >
    > --
    > This message has been scanned for viruses and
    > dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
    >
    >

    -- 
    This message has been scanned for viruses and
    dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Reuben D. Budiardja: "load testing suggestion"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Oxidation number of atoms in thiocyanate ion
      ... >> knowledge of the different bonding types is buried deeply, ... but it also should compile on Windows. ... the hardware and OS you have. ... I'll cleanup the code a little bit and put some legal blurp in ...
      (sci.chem)
    • Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)
      ... returns an object for one instance of that hardware. ... This design means the actual hard link between different drivers is limited to ... support until it is needed. ... It's entirely possible to use both at once: compile some drivers into ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: z/800 to z9 upgrade questions
      ... We compile now in the z/800 about 18 hours, ... for different hardware architecture levels. ... There's also the interesting option of METAL C (in the z/OS 1.9 ... IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect ...
      (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
    • Re: FPGA C Compiler on sourceforge.net (TMCC derivative)
      ... > * Languages do not have all ANSI C features ... it does not mean it can't be based on ANSI C. ... You couldn't compile that efficiently to an FPGA - it would need the ... able to develop hardware acceleration for a given algorithm. ...
      (comp.arch.fpga)
    • Re: CPU runing at 100%, help
      ... Could be hardware - but.. ... Clean up and find out.. ... using Windows XP "prettifications". ... You should at least turn on the built in firewall. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)