ls * problem

Andrew.Bridgeman_at_corusgroup.com
Date: 06/28/04

  • Next message: Will Mc Donald: "Re: ls * problem" 
    To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:39:09 +0100

    As per list below i have 9 Redhat machines running version 2.4.18 and 7
    Redhat machines running 2.4.2. I have been having a problem with my 2.4.18
    machines in that when i do a ls * on some directories i get a messages
    saying " No Match" but if i go to the same area on my 2.4.2 machines it
    just lists the files fine as you would expect it too. I had a look into it
    a bit and found a rpm package called lsof. On my 2.4.18 machines i have
    lsof -4.51-2 and on my 2.4.2 machines i have lsof-4.51-1 which means that
    the later version of lsof seems to have the problem. I do not think i can
    go back to 4.51.1 on Redhat from a newer version, so has any body come
    across this problem and if so what did you do to fix it .I would be
    grateful for some instructions on the fix as well if possible?

    (Embedded image moved to file: pic03506.pcx)

    Any help is much appreciated.

    Regards

    Andrew Bridgeman
    IT Systems Engineer
    Corus Automotive
    IARC Building
    University of Warwick
    Coventry
    CV47AL
    Tel: 02476 241262

    **********************************************************************
    This transmission is confidential and must not be used or disclosed by
    anyone other than the intended recipient. Neither Corus Group Plc nor
    any of its subsidiaries can accept any responsibility for any use or
    misuse of the transmission by anyone.
    ********************************************************************** 

    


    -- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  • Next message: Will Mc Donald: "Re: ls * problem"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ls * problem
      ... > just lists the files fine as you would expect it too. ... On my 2.4.18 machines i have ... > the later version of lsof seems to have the problem. ... > across this problem and if so what did you do to fix it .I would be ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: ** Sobig.F attack expected 3:00pm to 6:00pm EST today [Friday 22]
      ... > The worm is capable of retrieving filefrom a remote server - the ... > to data sent from infected machines. ... >> making the download executable available until the attack begins. ... >> has been added to our lists without your consent, ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: ** Sobig.F attack expected 3:00pm to 6:00pm EST today [Friday 22]
      ... > The worm is capable of retrieving filefrom a remote server - the ... > to data sent from infected machines. ... >> making the download executable available until the attack begins. ... >> has been added to our lists without your consent, ...
      (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
    • Re: ** Sobig.F attack expected 3:00pm to 6:00pm EST today [Friday 22]
      ... > The worm is capable of retrieving filefrom a remote server - the ... > to data sent from infected machines. ... >> making the download executable available until the attack begins. ... >> has been added to our lists without your consent, ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: copying track names between SD 744T/788T
      ... but ONLY to IHD. ... of the other machines IHD. ... lists on each machine ... I tried it with a CF card but only managed to copy user settings like ...
      (rec.arts.movies.production.sound)