Re: Non-random PIDs
From: Jason Dixon (jason_at_dixongroup.net)
Date: 08/01/04
- Previous message: Jason Dixon: "Non-random PIDs"
- In reply to: Jason Dixon: "Non-random PIDs"
- Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Non-random PIDs"
- Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Non-random PIDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:29:37 -0400 To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
On Aug 1, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> I remember reading a long time ago about how Linux doesn't randomize
> new process ID's, in the way that OpenBSD (among others, I hope) does.
> Is there anyone here who follows Linux kernel development closely
> that might know why this hasn't happened yet, or perhaps know when it
> will?
I see that there is a maintained random-PID patch for the 2.4 series.
The author claims it was rejected by Alan Cox because it was merely
"security through obscurity". I'm a little surprised to hear that, but
oh well. For anyone that's interested:
http://www.vanheusden.com/Linux/rnd_pid_faq.php
-- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: Jason Dixon: "Non-random PIDs"
- In reply to: Jason Dixon: "Non-random PIDs"
- Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Non-random PIDs"
- Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Non-random PIDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]