Outbound ports to firewall?
From: Parker Morse (morse_at_sinauer.com)
Date: 09/24/04
- Previous message: Stuart Sears: "Re: Mounting a Tape Drive"
- Next in thread: Jason Dixon: "Re: Outbound ports to firewall?"
- Reply: Jason Dixon: "Re: Outbound ports to firewall?"
- Maybe reply: Jason Staudenmayer: "RE: Outbound ports to firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: redhat-list@redhat.com Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:29:25 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Like most people, I've put some effort into filtering incoming email
and firewalling my network to prevent nasties from getting in. But
recent discussion of preventing the spread of Windows worms, viruses,
etc. etc. has led me to a question I don't have an answer for.
Let's assume, for a thought experiment, that one of the Windows boxen
inside my gateway firewall is infected with *something*, who knows
what. To protect the rest of the 'net from this little bundle of
pestilence in the time before I track it down and choke it to death, I
should probably have some firewall rules to keep the bulk of the
nastiness from leaving my network. Outbound rules.
What ports should I consider closing up to keep hypothetical infected
inside my network from phoning home and/or spreading the infection?
Thanks,
pjm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBVCE4nRVGoRROKxIRAlY6AJwNfaqDNjqkUXf/q9qP+XKfM4hcwwCdHGMs
ewSWmlTgQ3uCEu6WfxNazpQ=
=NEYK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: Stuart Sears: "Re: Mounting a Tape Drive"
- Next in thread: Jason Dixon: "Re: Outbound ports to firewall?"
- Reply: Jason Dixon: "Re: Outbound ports to firewall?"
- Maybe reply: Jason Staudenmayer: "RE: Outbound ports to firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|