RE: GRUB in the MBR
From: Igal Baldran (ZYB_at_il.ibm.com)
Date: 11/12/04
- Previous message: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- In reply to: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- Next in thread: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- Reply: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:51:34 +0200
I need two windows OS that I can sysprep to move to some systems.
Microsoft do not support sysprep OS on D:\.
This why I need a boot manager, NTLDR is not good this time for my task.
If some one can reply to my question on minimum grub files I will be
helpful.
Thank you.
"Otto Haliburton"
<ottohaliburton@c
omcast.net> To
Sent by: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion
redhat-list-bounc list'" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
es@redhat.com cc
Subject
12/11/2004 16:34 RE: GRUB in the MBR
Please respond to
General Red Hat
Linux discussion
list
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Igal Baldran
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 7:58 AM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: RE: GRUB in the MBR
>
>
> Hello,
> What are the minimum files I need to put in a first partition on the disk
> so GRUB will work with out full Linux installed on the Disk.
> I need to boot two Win2003 OS with GRUB but I do not want full Linux
> installation on the disk.
> I thought about creating three partitions:
> first will host the minimum files of GRUB to make it working.
> To the second I will ghost a windows OS
> To the third I will ghost a second windows OS
> Please advice.
> Thank you.
>
>
Windows 2000 has it's own multi-boot boot loader. Use that and forget
GRUB.
If you don't want linux then why use GRUB. Use another boot loader. There
are many available and it just so happens that Win2000 has one.
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> > bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Igal Baldran
> > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 7:34 AM
> > To: redhat-list@redhat.com
> > Subject: GRUB in the MBR
> >
> > Hello,
> > I am trying to install GRUB in to the MBR.
> > I did it by in
> > Do any one know if I can include Stage2 and other config files in the
> MBR
> > it self?
> > Please advice.
> >
> > Regards
> > Igal
> >
> >
> No you cannot install stage2 into the MBR it is too big. Only stage1 and
> stag1.5 can be written to the MBR. Stage1.5 is written to the area
> immediately after the MBR if it is available stage1.5 is not always
> present.
> These modules sole purpose is to load stage2 so they are very small.
>
>
>
> --
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Previous message: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- In reply to: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- Next in thread: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- Reply: Otto Haliburton: "RE: GRUB in the MBR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|