Re: Linux vs Windows (Postgres)

From: Bob Smith (bob_at_netprt.com)
Date: 03/24/05

  • Next message: Wayne Pinette: "Re: Linux vs Windows (Postgres)"
    Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:18:54 -0700 (MST)
    To: "Darryl W. DeLao Jr." <ddelao@gmail.com>, "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Only a few reasons why that I can think of.

    -Linux scales to multiple processors and multiple processor types.

    -You can move PostgreSQL to larger UNIX boxes other than Linux,
    and can be sure that it will run.

    -PostgreSQL is originally a UNIX based solution, and most of the
    tools that are available run on UNIX platforms.

    -Windows costs more to scale than Linux. Windows costs more to
    manage and maintain than Linux.

    -Linux threading is stronger than Windows, and supports multiple
    processes better, resulting in reduced equipment costs and longer
    equipment rotations.

    -UNIX solutions are inherently more secure and less subject
    to break-in, reducing the theft potential by break-in or corruption
    by virus. Windows platforms are notoriously weak with respect
    to virus protection. Management and maintenance costs would
    be reduced.

    -Windows upgrade cycle is consistently about 2-3 years to replacement,
    resulting in higher equipment replacement costs.

    -The Windows solution is only recent. It's usually a good idea
    to let the technology mature a bit before trusting an Enterprise
    solution to it.

    -There is a lot of support from other UNIX-based PostgreSQL users.

    HTH,

    -Bob

    > Can anyone give me some reasons, other than the obvious, as to why
    > Postgres should be run on Linux instead of Windows. These need to be
    > business related justifications.
    >
    > Thanks for the help!
    >
    > --
    > redhat-list mailing list
    > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    >

    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Wayne Pinette: "Re: Linux vs Windows (Postgres)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: What is the more popular UNIX flavor?
      ... about my experience with Solaris and Cygwin. ... installing packages. ... needing eg tftp you only need to activate on a Unix system. ... probably need installing first on the equivalent Windows system. ...
      (comp.unix.questions)
    • Re: Five Architectural Flaws in Windows Solved In Mac OS X
      ... But it is still an improvement over Unix, wherein *any executable* can be highly privileged and interact with the user. ... The usual security precautions prevent unauthorized people from doing this, but that's true on Windows also. ... I just got thru upgrading the wifes Mac to Tiger and hpfs is the default. ... This is a more advanced design that Unixes have been trying to duplicate by adding thread support. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Linux no threat to Microsoft
      ... originally developed for Unix. ... Windows has't come on any of the machines I've ever purchased. ... Yet over those years Linux Market Share on the desktop has actually ... philosophy of Apple - later adopted by Microsoft. ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Re: OS X "Security" myths
      ... >> lot of UNIX systems down to their knees. ... >>> their code, so they concentrate on developing exploits for Windows, ... > It does tell me that there is not much "boast factor" for malware ... Just like the Hackers convention in Las Vegas known as ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Wozu Linux privat einsetzen?
      ... > Open Source bzw. GNU sind nicht an eine bestimmte Plattform gebunden. ... Windows ist nun mal nicht OpenSource. ... > Unix ist genauso gewachsen wie DOS, OS/2, Windows. ...
      (de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc)