RE: Why redhat will never get another dime of my money.

From: Steven Jones (Steven.Jones_at_vuw.ac.nz)
Date: 03/30/05

  • Next message: Mike Wooding: "Re: umount question"
    Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:56:57 +1200
    To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Personally I am very shocked at RH's quality, it is as bad if not worse
    than MS IMHO. And it doesn't end there.... we also get Support from MS
    and as we have Sun servers as well, Sun, then add in HP for tru64 boxes
    and RH is by far the worst performer of the lot in terms of release and
    patch quality, and their support, well......

    Having used Debian for 8 years, Solaris for 5 and having to use RH for 9
    months commercially the difference is tremendous.......

    I am seriously looking at Suse, at least with Novell down the road I
    have someone to kick locally in NZ. Dell NZ/AP suck for RH support and
    RH in the USA just do not cut it either.

    8><----

    >So you didn't properly test a new release that impacted 100 servers?
    >Shame on you...

    The computer software world has a lot to learn, while I agree with you
    up to a point....In a QA engineering environment you trust the item you
    install as being fit for its purpose, you do not need to test it, its
    QA'd. In turn when you release something as QA'd in turn the person
    downline should be able to trust it is going to work.

    8><-----

    >It doesn't matter if you buy a car or software - you need to test drive
    >each one and determine how it's going to react to what you're going to
    >do. If it's important to you, test it first and develop a backout
    >plan.

    See my comments above.....

    Regards

    Thing

    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Mike Wooding: "Re: umount question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Whats the story with the "end of XP"?
      ... Support gives them access to the larger body ... vendors give them access to effective code generation. ... We work very closely with our customers to ... there is no general rule that "closed source is good quality, ...
      (comp.arch.embedded)
    • OVERHAUL, PARTS SALES AND SERVICE
      ... We have earned an excellent reputation of providing customers with the ... in quality parts in services. ... We support the requirements of airlines ... Quality Standards ...
      (rec.aviation.owning)
    • OVERHAUL, PARTS SALES AND SERVICE
      ... We have earned an excellent reputation of providing customers with the ... in quality parts in services. ... We support the requirements of airlines ... Quality Standards ...
      (rec.aviation.military.naval)
    • OVERHAUL, PARTS SALES AND SERVICE
      ... We have earned an excellent reputation of providing customers with the ... in quality parts in services. ... We support the requirements of airlines ... Quality Standards ...
      (rec.aviation.misc)
    • illusion of "service==disabled", what to do when programs require admin to run...?
      ... I suppose I already suspected this to be true, but setting security ... I can see, possibly, a need for admin priviledges for a program to install ... good sign of software quality. ... way to support themselves. ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.security)