Re: e-mail scan

From: Ugo Bellavance (ugob_at_camo-route.com)
Date: 06/14/05

  • Next message: Ugo Bellavance: "Re: .sh" 
    To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:38:56 -0400

    Rushan Sobar wrote:
    > hi all,
    >
    > I know its not the right place to ask this directly but maybe some of you using this so they can advise.
    >
    > anyone can advice which better to use as e-mails virus canner on REDHAT 9 sendmail the :
    >
    > AMaViSD-New or MailScanner ?

    I run MailScanner and love it, but I'll never say Amavis is bad, since I
    never tried it. I think the biggest difference is that Amavis is more
    like a network daemon, and MailScanner is more a daemon that plays
    within a box, through the FS. I've seen some comparison between both,
    but I can't see any is better than the other one. I'm managing ~13
    MailScanner servers and I can't really complain. One thing, for sure,
    is that the support on the MailScanner mailing list is very good. I
    don't know about Amavis'.

    If you'd like to try MailScanner, maybe you should try SMGateway, which
    is a commercial product based on MailScanner with many othe packages,
    very easy to install and configure. Product is free, updates are
    decently priced.

    www.fsl.com

    Hth

    Ugo 

    -- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  • Next message: Ugo Bellavance: "Re: .sh"