Re: Re: RHEL without License?

From: Rik Herrin (
Date: 07/13/05

  • Next message: Ugo Bellavance: "Re: RHEL without License?"
    Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:20:41 -0700 (PDT)

      I know that one of the RHEL clones might be better
    in this situation. But I am asking because when I
    come to propose RHEL to clients, they sometimes ask
    what their situation would be legally if after a year
    or two, they wanted to keep their systems running but
    without paying support. Would they be forced to shut
    down these systems (I think this is the case with
    Windows Server which is probably why they are asking
    since they don't want to be in the same trap)? Or
    could they continue running them and just not get
    updates from RHN? Thanks for your input.

    > Rik Herrin wrote:
    > > Thanks a lot for your reply Ian. But it there any
    > > documentation or anything documenting that you can
    > > so? Also, in reference to the question of
    > > the ISOs for free (30 day trial) and then
    > > to use them after the 30 day trial period without
    > > paying, is this legal? Thanks for your time.
    > Aren't you better off using a clone like CentOS then
    and give a few
    > bucks here and there?

    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

    redhat-list mailing list

  • Next message: Ugo Bellavance: "Re: RHEL without License?"