RE: Problems to Install Oracle Client 10g over Red Hat AS 3.0update3

From: Lunt, Nick (Nick.Lunt_at_wesleyan.co.uk)
Date: 11/16/05

  • Next message: Tolga Evren: "RE: what is lpfc_do_dpc_0?"
    Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:24:25 -0000
    To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Hi,

    All my 64 bit machines with Oracle on are AMD, Im afraid I have no experience of POWER 5 servers.

    Personally I would not use the nodeps arg to RPM on a production machine.

    I take it that you have tried to install the RPM's with rpm -Uvh instead of -ivh too ?
    Also I would suggest trying to install the required packages using up2date.

    I don't know if either of those methods will work. We had a situation here a couple of weeks ago
    where one of our junior admins made a mess of RPM on a server by using nodeps etc with important library packages,
    and they ended up having to reinstall !

    Good Luck,
    Nick .

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Fábio Augusto [mailto:fabiomirmar@gmail.com]
    > Sent: 16 November 2005 13:08
    > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
    > Subject: Re: Problems to Install Oracle Client 10g over Red Hat AS
    > 3.0update3
    >
    >
    > Mr. Lunt,
    >
    > First of all, thanks a lot by answering my message.
    >
    > Some libraries were already installed using both the 32 and 64 bit
    > packages. If I use the command rpm -ql package, I'm going to see some
    > libraries under the /lib directory and the same library under the
    > /lib64.
    >
    > The processor used by the Open Power Server is under the IBM POWER
    > architecture. If I'm not wrong, this is a POWER 5 processor.
    >
    > The great question is: Not all the libraries were installed, and now I
    > have to do it, so in the installation media, I have some packadges
    > called packagename-version.ppc.rpm and other packadges called
    > packagename-version.ppc64.rpm, but If I install one of them and then
    > try to install the other, I receive the message filed to install,
    > packadge packagename-version.ppc64.rpm conflicts with
    > packagename-version.ppc.rpm already installed.
    >
    > What should I do? Which is the best way to install those packadges? Is
    > it safe to use rpm -ivh packagename-version.ppc64.rpm --nodeps?
    >
    > Thanks a lot once more.
    >
    > 2005/11/16, Lunt, Nick <Nick.Lunt@wesleyan.co.uk>:
    > > You can install both the 64 and 32 bit versions of glibc,
    > libstdc++ etc.
    > >
    > > [root@bounty user_scripts]# rpm -q glibc glibc-devel
    > > glibc-2.3.4-2.13
    > > glibc-2.3.4-2.13
    > > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.13
    > > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.13
    > >
    > > I can then query which is which by running rpm -qil glibc
    > which will give me the info for both the 32 and 64 bit versions.
    > >
    > > If you having trouble installed the 32 and 64 bit versions
    > then there may be some other errors that are causing this.
    > >
    > > Good luck,
    > > Nick .
    > >
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > > From: redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com
    > > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com]
    > > > On Behalf Of Fábio Augusto
    > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:21 AM
    > > > To: Lista Red Hat
    > > > Subject: Problems to Install Oracle Client 10g over Red Hat
    > > > AS 3.0 update 3
    > > >
    > > > Good Evening for everyone,
    > > >
    > > > I'm working on the installation of a Red Hat AS
    > 3.0 update 3
    > > > Linux for a client. The Orable DBA sent me an e-mail
    > asking about the
    > > > installation of some pre-requisite packages for linux.
    > > >
    > > > I've installed all the required pre-requisite
    > packages over
    > > > linux, but I read something strange on the Documentation
    > for Oracle
    > > > Client installation. This documentation asks for the following
    > > > packages to be installed using both 64 and 32 bits RPMs:
    > > >
    > > > libgcc-3.2.3-42
    > > > libstdc++-3.2.3-42
    > > > libstdc++-devel-3.2.3-42
    > > > glibc-2.3.2-95.27
    > > > glibc-devel-2*
    > > >
    > > > I'm using a Open Power (pSeries - 64 bits) Server. If I
    > > > install the 64 bit package of any of those and then try
    > to install the
    > > > 32 bits package, I'm going to receive and error message
    > telling that
    > > > the installation conflicts with the package already installed.
    > > >
    > > > Does anyone here have already tryied to install two versions of
    > > > package on the same machine? How can I install without having the
    > > > conflict? Does anyone have successfully installed an
    > Oracle Client 10g
    > > > over a Red Hat AS 3 update 3? Which is the best way to do this
    > > > installation?
    > > >
    > > > Thanks a Lot!!
    > > >
    > > > Regards,
    > > > --
    > > > Fábio Augusto Miranda Martins
    > > > Fone: 6202-3897 / 6987-0590
    > > > Cel: 9638-9085
    > > > E-mail: fabiomirmar@gmail.com
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > redhat-list mailing list
    > > > unsubscribe
    > mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > redhat-list mailing list
    > > > unsubscribe
    > mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Wesleyan Administration Services Ltd registered number
    > 5188850 and Wesleyan Unit Trust Managers Ltd registered
    > number 2114859 ("WUTM Ltd")
    > > are wholly owned subsidiary companies of Wesleyan Assurance
    > Society, whose registered number is ZC145.
    > > WUTM Ltd is a member of IMA. For ISA/PEP/Unit Trusts
    > Administration Centre: PO Box Basildon SS15 5WQ Telephone:
    > 0870 601 6129
    > > Wesleyan Assurance Society and WUTM Ltd are authorised and
    > regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
    > > Head Office, Colmore Circus, Birmingham B4 6AR. Telephone:
    > 0121 200 3003 Fax 0121 200 2971.
    > > Website: www.wesleyan.co.uk Telephone calls may be recorded
    > for monitoring and training purposes.
    > >
    > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
    > >
    > > This communication and the information it contains is
    > intended for the person or organisation to whom it is
    > addressed. Its contents are confidential and may be protected
    > in law. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it
    > may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient,
    > please contact us immediately.
    > >
    > > The contents of any attachments in this e-mail may contain
    > software viruses, which could damage your own computer
    > system. While every reasonable precaution to minimise this
    > risk has been taken, we cannot accept liability for any
    > damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You
    > should carry out your own virus checking procedure before
    > opening any attachment.
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > redhat-list mailing list
    > > unsubscribe
    > mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    > >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Fábio Augusto Miranda Martins
    > Fone: 6202-3897 / 6987-0590
    > Cel: 9638-9085
    > E-mail: fabiomirmar@gmail.com
    >
    > --
    > redhat-list mailing list
    > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    >

    -- 
    redhat-list mailing list
    unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
    

  • Next message: Tolga Evren: "RE: what is lpfc_do_dpc_0?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: production server
      ... After a 2 hour install process it ... There are offspring sites that are providing packages ... being a server.. ... Then I came full circle back to Fedora, for all its faults it does ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: branding debian releases
      ... those distros is to help the developers do what needs to be done to get ... packages into good shape and get releases out. ... and also distros like `server' and `workstation' and so on?" ... Install them. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: [SLE] General comments about 10.1 retail (box)
      ... yast is an invaluable tool for server ... some other problems during installs, I install suse on everything I ... packages then the DVD and old machines only have cd-roms so I was ...
      (SuSE)
    • [Full-Disclosure] SuSE Security Announcement: samba (SuSE-SA:2003:025)
      ... file server, the widely spread implementation of the SMB protocol. ... Therefore, the update packages ... are being offered to install from the maintenance web. ... standard appendix: authenticity verification, ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: {Disarmed} Re: problems w/ net (http) install
      ... I believe that using NFS, you would want to serve out the ISO and not ... installation and http server base for installation. ... NFS isn't strictly off the table, but the system hosting this install ... Nope the packages aren't big ones, fairly standard, 1MB-ish packages, ...
      (Fedora)