Re: OOT: MailScanner vs Amavisd-new
- From: Shah Komal Kiritkumar <countofdracula@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:03:09 +0530
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 13:49 +0700, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> Hello General,
>
> Perhaps this is out of topic, for that sorry for inconvenient.
> Currently I tested two opensource softwares to check emails for
> spam and possible cleaning viruses as well.
>
> The options are MailScanner and Amavisd-new (or if there are any
> others options... welcome)
>
> What I looking for is low resources (should be run under 256 MB
> server can handle 2000 emails /day) and possibly no lose emails.
> The software only tag emails for spam, and delete email that
> contains viruses.
> There will be no automatically white list, manual only.
> For anti virus, I choose ClamAV.
> For SMTP server I can do sendmail or postfix... but more prefer
> to postfix.
> I know this will be very subjective, I mostly choose amavisd-new
> because of postfix, but I will be open minded.
>
Use mailscanner for Sendmail and Amasivd-new for postfix.
Regards,
Dracula
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- References:
- OOT: MailScanner vs Amavisd-new
- From: Budi Febrianto
- OOT: MailScanner vs Amavisd-new
- Prev by Date: OOT: MailScanner vs Amavisd-new
- Next by Date: Re: OOT: MailScanner vs Amavisd-new
- Previous by thread: OOT: MailScanner vs Amavisd-new
- Next by thread: Re: OOT: MailScanner vs Amavisd-new
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|