Re: Re Help with ES v3 Raid



We are on the same thing. Just had a look at /etc/mdadm.conf and I have
no entries. Do I have to enter anything in this manually?

Marc

On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 16:01 -0500, Tom Callahan wrote:
> try this:
>
> run "mdadm --detail --scan"
> and paste the output into /etc/mdadm.conf, after removing all lines that
> say "PARTITION" or "ARRAY"
>
> Then try rebooting and see what happens. I fear your array is not being
> restarted upon boot.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom Callahan
> TESSCO Technologies
> Desk: (410)-229-1361
> Cell: (443)-506-6216
> Email: callahant@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> A real engineer only resorts to documentation when the keyboard dents on the forehead get too noticeable.
>
>
>
> Marc Leveille wrote:
>
> >I followed your advice and was able to make a file system on /dev/mdo. I
> >enter this entry in fstab
> >/dev/md0 /home/apps ext3 defaults 1 2
> >
> >I tried ext2 and ext3 and got the same error after re-booting.this
> >happens when Checking file system runs
> >" The superblock could not be read or does not describe a valid ext2
> >file system/.
> >
> >the odd thing is that as soon as I create the file system on /dev/md0, I
> >can mount it using mount -t ext3 /dev/md0 /home/apps. I can go in and
> >see the lost and found folder. it only fails after a re-boot. Also if I
> >remove the mdo entry in fstab, reboot and try mounting it manually, it
> >now fails (invalid file system)
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >Marc
> >
> >On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:30 -0500, Frank DiPrete wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Check the order here:
> >>
> >>1) create physical partitions on sdb and sdc of type linux raid
> >>2) create the (soft) raid array
> >>3) mkfs on the raid device created in step 2
> >>4) mount the file system created in step 3
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Re Help with ES v3 Raid
    ... > Marc Leveille wrote: ... >>happens when Checking file system runs ... it only fails after a re-boot. ... >>>1) create physical partitions on sdb and sdc of type linux raid ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Dumb filesystem idea
    ... Im about to try a disklayout experiment and I wanted to ask everyone if ... SCSI is too expensive to waste on 10GB drives. ... losing the ability to have a high-capacicy file system. ... fault tolerance of RAID 1 and RAID 5 are nearly the same, ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • RE: Machine not Booting - Update
    ... Have you tried mounting the software RAID partition manually? ... It seems like it has no proper file system to mount. ... When i try a mount -a when the machine has come up i get the error below. ... This transmission is confidential and must not be used or disclosed by ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Dumb filesystem idea
    ... Im about to try a disklayout experiment and I wanted to ask everyone if ... SCSI is too expensive to waste on 10GB drives. ... losing the ability to have a high-capacicy file system. ... fault tolerance of RAID 1 and RAID 5 are nearly the same, ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • VxFS volume - 99% full - SCSI tran_err
    ... Veritas VolumeManager and FileSystem 3.5 and a 4 TB hardware ... All of the RAID capacity is tied together via VxVM (Stripe over 4 LUNs ... and this single volume than formatted with VxFS. ... hundreds of GB onto this file system. ...
    (SunManagers)