RE: OS Overhead
- From: "Job Cacka" <job@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:46:57 -0800
I think there is a Linux distribution called Real Time Linux that would suit
an application that was time sensitive like this. A Real Time OS is your
best bet with this type of application.
Job Cacka
-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Burke, Thomas G.
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 12:37 PM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: OS Overhead
All,
This is a somewhat convoluted question, but here goes...
We are creating a system that has a "timeline" (e.g. tasks must
be completed in a given amount of time)
OK, so we have a processor (we'll stay generic at this point)
that will be running a linux based kernel, and we want to figure out how
much processor availability we have (e.g. clock tics in a given time).
We know that the kernel functions (including resource
allocation, interrupt hadling, and so on) take up some omount of CPU
horsepower (albeit small)
What is a good general rule of thumb for a barebones linux
system? I know this is gross estimation, but does the kernel use up 20%
of my CPU resources? 10%? Any ideas?
Thanks
Tom
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subjecthttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/
listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- References:
- OS Overhead
- From: Burke, Thomas G.
- OS Overhead
- Prev by Date: RE: OpenLDAP + User Authentication
- Next by Date: RE: OpenLDAP + User Authentication
- Previous by thread: OS Overhead
- Next by thread: Re: OS Overhead
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|