RE: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY and Harddisk problem
- From: "David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A." <d.tonhofer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:39:46 +0100
--On Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:21 AM -0500 "Bliss, Aaron" <ABliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What can I do for such a case? Can't Linux mark bad blocks so that they
can't be used? Does it have something like scandisk or chkdsk?
Oops sorry, I lose bigtime. I misattributed the quote to Aaron instead of
Ong Ying Ying. The only thing left to do is to blame my tool...
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- References:
- RE: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY and Harddisk problem
- From: Bliss, Aaron
- RE: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY and Harddisk problem
- From: David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A.
- RE: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY and Harddisk problem
- Prev by Date: RE: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY and Harddisk problem
- Next by Date: Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY and Harddisk problem
- Previous by thread: RE: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY and Harddisk problem
- Index(es):
