fsck failure at boot



We have an Altix 350 (ia64) 2-node server running RHAS 4. I just installed a fibre Qlogic HBA (QLA2310) in the controller node, which seemed to work fine. I formatted one large ext3 partition (sdb1) and was able to mount it flawlessly. Upon rebooting, however, the system hung while checking the new filesystem:

...
Checking all file systems.
[/sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /san] fsck.ext3 -a /dev/sdb1
/dev/sdb1:
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
e2fsck -b 8193 <device>

fsck.ext3: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/sdb1
[FAILED]

*** An error occurred during the file system check.
*** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot
*** when you leave the shell.
Give root password for maintenance
(or type Control-D to continue):
...


Fsck'g the filesystem reports it as clean, and I'm able to mount the partition immediately:

(Repair filesystem) 1 # fsck.ext3 /dev/sdb1
e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
/dev/sdb1: clean, 11/61292544 files, 1949532/122554648 blocks
(Repair filesystem) 2 # mount /san
(Repair filesystem) 3 # df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
74G 7.6G 63G 11% /
/dev/sdb1 461G 102M 437G 1% /san


Does anyone have any clues as to why this is happening? If I comment out the relevant line in fstab, the machine boots up fine. I can then manually mount the filesystem, but certainly this should not be necessary.

[root@altix ~]# grep san /etc/fstab
/dev/sdb1 /san ext3 defaults 1 2


Thanks,

--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
    ... Unfortunately, mounting an ext3 partition, even in read-only ... does perform some operations on the filesystem. ... Do you mean that the installer mounts partitions, ... It's a bad idea to just go ahead and mount filesystems that you aren't ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: mount() function problem !
    ... mount() attaches the filesystem specified by source (which is often a device name, ... point within a file system. ... details of the options available for each filesystem type. ... Specifies the journalling mode for file data. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
    ... >entangling autofs with that work. ... >filesystem it's willing to export. ... >>map is mounted. ... The result is that some users will see mount points ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: UFS Bug: FreeBSD 6.1/6.2/7.0: MOKB-08-11-2006, CVE-2006-5824, MOKB-03
    ... They can simply mount a filesystem with any number of SUID ... root binaries on it and have their way with the box. ... They have physical access to the machine. ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: Automove vs Noautomove in BPXPRMxx
    ... read/write filesystem and the executables are in a separate, ... trying to manually mount the filesystem or you have a corrupted mount ... Automove vs Noautomove in BPXPRMxx ... Are you saying you have the same data set name but 2 physically ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)