Re: ES or Fedora
- From: mroth@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:09:14 -0600
From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, December 28, 2006 10:58 am
Quoting Robert Canary <rwcanary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:<snip>
I have a couple new servers I was needing to put online.most> recent ones I did so using RedHat 7.2. and recompiled most of
I have always built, compiled, and setup my own Linux boxes, the
the> software to make it fit what I wanted.
However, the options availbale today will suit we just me just fine
without allot of recomipling.
So why would take Fedora over ES, or vice versa?
Fedora:
- free
- bleeding edge (less stable, more features, updates can push new
versions) - short life cycle
RHEL:
- price tag (annual subscription)
This is the reason I migtated to SuSE on my home systems - Fedora, from
what I've read, seems to be bleeding edge, and I have no enthusiasm to
come home from being a sysadmin to debug the o/s. If I'd known of it, I
might have gone to CentOS. I want stability, and I won't spend serious
money (I mean, if I wanted to do that, I could buy WinDoze.... <g>) on
the o/s.
Btw, the bleeding edgeiness of Fedora is ESR's feeling, too, or at least
it was when we were talking about just this, about a year ago.
mark
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ES or Fedora
- From: Robert Canary
- Re: ES or Fedora
- References:
- ES or Fedora
- From: Robert Canary
- Re: ES or Fedora
- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic
- ES or Fedora
- Prev by Date: Re: ES or Fedora
- Next by Date: Re: ES or Fedora
- Previous by thread: Re: ES or Fedora
- Next by thread: Re: ES or Fedora
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
