Re: Email IP Address
- From: Lord of Gore <lordofgore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:10:36 +0200
Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
Not to start a flame war,If you were really concerned about this you would have sent me a private message. I do from time to time. You can even ask for my YM id if you want to hate me in real-time. But this obliges me to make a public point of view.
here, but isn't a pissy response like thisNo it's not because it will make a future economy of bandwidth when this guy and others will think twice before asking a dumb question like that one.
also a waste of bandwidth?
You on the other hand, unfortunately, do not see this from a realistic point of view. Consider the fact that such an e-mail needs a reply to ask for a better description of the problem. That reply will be replied by another e-mail containing more or less pertinent info on the matter. Maybe someone thinks of a specific problem, sends a reply to the first mail and receives one about not resolving the real problem. We have now how many e-mails that didn't really solved the problem? I'll tell you: five. say the medium size of the e-mails is 2KB. Multiply with 5 e-mails and with 1000 subscribers and you'll have a 10MB useless communication. Waste enough for you?
Come on, maybe the guy's new?No. I told you, he's lazy. Or he sucks at communication skills. Either way redhat-list is not guilty for this. If you are his advocate then tell me what he meant when he said "IP address of every email" and why you are 100% he meant it. Responses below 100% degree of certitude are not taken in account because this incertitude will generate mail replies with at least twice the size.
Shit, I haveThen you should uninstall them. I am not complaining about the whole e-mail IP thing but about the fact that an e-mail's envelope contains many info that could be probed for an IP address. Therefore the mention about the mind reading. Maybe you have a crystal ball but I broke mine while trying to unleash the hidden powers of micro$oft wi(n)dow$. The damn thing resigned and imploded. Said it was overworked and overqualified for the job.
reporting tools that tell me the originating IP's of certain things
(e.g. malformed messages or control commands), and I have no idea how
they got them.
For others that have itchy hands/fingers: Yes, this e-mail *is* contained in the waste of bandwidth type of communication. :) . The only excuse is that I had to stand up and defend my point of view. 10q for your patience.
-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lord of Gore
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 8:23 AM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: Email IP Address
Rizwan Khan wrote:
HelloAnother mail that I consider waste of bandwidth just because someone is
I wanted to check the IP address of every email that i am receiving, is there any standard way of getting IP adress of incoming emails.
Thanks in advance
lazy enough to think that we are mind readers...
emails don't have ip addresses. tcp/ip packets do. maybe you' like to
tell us exactly what you want to find out.
sender's domain mx? originating smtp server?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Email IP Address
- From: Amit Mohan
- Re: Email IP Address
- References:
- Email IP Address
- From: Rizwan Khan
- Re: Email IP Address
- From: Lord of Gore
- RE: Email IP Address
- From: Burke, Thomas G.
- Email IP Address
- Prev by Date: Re: sendmail (Junk Mail)
- Next by Date: Re: Email IP Address
- Previous by thread: Re: Email IP Address
- Next by thread: Re: Email IP Address
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|