Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: Lord of Gore <lordofgore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:38:33 +0200
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17207
...
...
Hello,
Yes , so???? I write that sendmail has more security problems that
postfix, not sendmail has currently unfixed security holes :)
Regards
js.
I don't know why you argue so much when qmail was, is and will remain the most secure of them all >:)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: Res
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- References:
- SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: nilesh vaghela
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: security
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: Ben
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: Robert Canary
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: security
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: Robert Canary
- Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- From: security
- SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- Prev by Date: Re: Help on Cron
- Next by Date: Re: Load Balancer
- Previous by thread: Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- Next by thread: Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|