RE: [unclassified] RE: RHEL 5 on a Dell PowerEdge 600SC
- From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:25:29 +0200
Gaddis, Jeremy L. <> wrote on Monday, June 25, 2007 12:05 PM:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
<grin> I agree, but what if you want to build your own
monster-workstation with high-end components? None of the
brand-names in the industry (Dell, HP whatever) are that
well-known for providing really fast stuff. So I'm left with
building my own machine(s). Granted, I found some usable
hcl-lists on linuxquestions.org but that doesn't feel that
official, just some geek's word for it, that it will work. Know what I
mean? 8-]
How do you guys do it? Only brandnames in the server-room and on
the desks?
That's how we do it. I work at a .edu so we get decent pricing on both
servers and workstations. With the servers, sticking with what we
already have means we're already familiar with the hardware and we know
that it works. For workstations, sticking to the same hardware "family"
means we don't have to build new images for new hardware. It's
extremely nice to be able to only install the OS and applications once,
make an image of it, and deploy that out to hundreds or thousands of
workstations. Having similar hardware means we also have spare parts
on-hand in the event of a hardware failure. In addition, we have great
support from our vendors which comes in handy at times.
Years ago, I had the "build it myself so I know what it's in it, plus I
can do it cheaper" mentality for my own machines, but I don't even do
that anymore. It's to the point where just about any machine I buy will
support Linux (keep in mind I don't play games, do any high-end graphics
work, etc.) and the price of PCs has came down so much it's not really
that economical to build it yourself anymore. I don't even have a
custom-built box at home anymore -- they're all machines purchased
direct from the likes of HP or Dell (though I've added larger HDDs and
more RAM to all of them).
My newest workstation, an HP xw4400 (Core 2 Duo, SATA HDDs, DVD-RW,
nVIDIA, etc.), has no problem running XP, Vista, Ubuntu, Fedora or RHEL
out of the box. We've really came a long way (with regards to Linux
hardware support) in the last several years, thanks in part to companies
like Red Hat.
Well, that's really the gotcha' over here. We mainly use the RHEL-machines to
do molecular modelling and calculations related to the modelling. That's why
they need to be really fast and preferrably have a high-end (nvidia) gfx-card.
Our windows-park is a bit more heterogenous, but lately I've begun buying 2-3
year old Fujitsu and Dell SFF-machines with the same basic hardware layout, as
the desktop park is really old and needs to be upgraded over the next year.
The Linux-machines are a bit more complicated, but will still last longer. 8-]
Thx for your reply. I think I have all I need for now!
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- References:
- RE: [unclassified] RE: RHEL 5 on a Dell PowerEdge 600SC
- From: Sorin Srbu
- RE: [unclassified] RE: RHEL 5 on a Dell PowerEdge 600SC
- From: Gaddis, Jeremy L.
- RE: [unclassified] RE: RHEL 5 on a Dell PowerEdge 600SC
- Prev by Date: RE: [unclassified] RE: RHEL 5 on a Dell PowerEdge 600SC
- Next by Date: Re: How do you get your RHEL CDs?
- Previous by thread: RE: [unclassified] RE: RHEL 5 on a Dell PowerEdge 600SC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- RE: [unclassified] RE: RHEL 5 on a Dell PowerEdge 600SC
... monster-workstation with high-end components? ... For workstations, sticking
to the same hardware "family" ... direct from the likes of HP or Dell (though I've
added larger HDDs and ... (RedHat) - Re: Saw 10.4.1 Running On a PC Laptop Today
... way for the software sales to be high enough to make up for losing the hardware
... And they would rather pay $200 for a site license for Windows rather than pay an extra $1000
for an "Apple" machine even tho the OS is so much cheaper and more elegant than Windows. ...
Even home users, when faced with a choice between a $600 Dell with XP Home Edition, and $1800+
for an "Apple" machine with OSX, almost ALWAYS choose the $600 Dell, even tho the "Apple" platform is
so much more beautiful. ... (comp.sys.mac.advocacy) - Re: Time for a new server
... had to do this and I'm very out of touch with the hardware market. ... We've
used Dell in the past, and comparing the Dell and IBM machines ... servers.
... (uk.comp.os.linux) - More Dell frustration (part 3).
... I visited my other site and plugged in my laptop into the Dock only to find
it had no network connection. ... Everything was as it should be, except the Dell laptop
just would not connect to the company's network. ... So it's off to the control panel and into
the Network Connection -> Local Area Connection -> Configure (to configure the Broadcom NetXtreme
57xx Gigabit Controller (LIKE I CARE WHAT PIECE OF HARDWARE CRAP I'M TRYING TO GET TO WORK!).
... (comp.sys.mac.advocacy) - Re: Opinions Wanted: Dell PowerEdge Servers ... ?
... They're not as good as in the past, but we have had hardware assistance on a FreeBSD-driven
server on the condition of proving hardware fault using Dell's own bootable diagnostics. ... our
support experience may be artificially "enhanced" compared to others because we buy off a large
govt. ... our overall experience with Dell support has actually been as good or better
than with many other vendors. ... One thing I do know is Dell's first tier support for servers
is worthless, but as Greg says, you just need to establish that you know what you're doing, and you can
bypass them. ... (freebsd-questions)