Re: Network Card Issue

Could be the port. You could try the cable on another port on the switch and
see if it does the same thing.

Romeo

On 6/28/07, Andrew.Bridgeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Andrew.Bridgeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



I do not think this is the same problem as I am seeing as we have four
other machines that have the same hardware/OS build and also connect to
the
same switch in our rack.

Regards

Andrew Bridgeman

|+---------------------------+--------------------------------------------|
|| BERES
Laszlo | |
|| <beres.laszlo@sys-admin.| To: General Red Hat Linux |
|| hu> | discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
|| Sent by: | cc: |
|| redhat-list-bounces@redh| Subject: Re: Network Card |
|| at.com |
Issue |
||
| |
|| 28/06/2007
08:06 | |
|| Please respond to
| |
|| General Red Hat Linux
| |
|| discussion list
| |
||
| |

|+---------------------------+--------------------------------------------|






Andrew.Bridgeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> running at 10Mb/s Full Duplex but I do have auto negotiation on so I am
> unsure as to why it is running at such a low speed and not using the
card
> at full speed? Any Ideas why before I have a go doing the command you
> suggested below?

Some kind of interfaces and active devices (switches, routers) can't
negotiate their speed and duplexity automatically, that's called duplex
mismatch. We had the same issue with 3Com cards and Cisco switches.

--
BÉRES László RHCE, RHCX
senior IT engineer, trainer

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



**********************************************************************
This transmission is confidential and must not be used or disclosed by
anyone other than the intended recipient. Neither Corus Group Plc nor
any of its subsidiaries can accept any responsibility for any use or
misuse of the transmission by anyone.

For address and company registration details of certain entities
within the Corus group of companies, please visit
http://www.corusgroup.com/entities

**********************************************************************


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




--
Romeo Theriault
System Administrator
University of Maine at Fort Kent
Ph#: 207-834-7815
Em@: romeo.theriault@xxxxxxxxx
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 100mbps link will not run above 10mbps
    ... OK, forcing 100 full duplex results in total failure, what about 100 half ... Is the cable from the NIC going direct to the switch or through a socket, ... Problem is that the local network connection will not go above 10mbps. ... was a hardware problem with the port, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: network very slow after upgrade to ML11
    ... Verify the switch port is also hard-coded to 100/Full Duplex. ... Is the machine plugged into an Ethernet hub or switch? ...
    (comp.unix.aix)
  • Re: Cat 2924
    ... Copyright 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, ... BOX in both H/W and S/W, compared to a C2924-XL Switch... ... FastEthernet0/1 failed front-end loopback test ... to make the port configuration "visible", you need to apply 2 commands ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: 5000 ethernet?
    ... A full duplex switch does not echo the sender's ... bits back to the sender's receiver. ... sending the bits to that one port out of the FIFO. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Cat 2924
    ... Copyright 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, ... BOX in both H/W and S/W, compared to a C2924-XL Switch... ... FastEthernet0/1 failed front-end loopback test ... to make the port configuration "visible", you need to apply 2 commands ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)