Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- From: Mike Kearey <mkearey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:27:26 +1000
Sandor W. Sklar wrote:
<snip>
ext3 is best used on a RHEL4 system because it's what we develop, test
and support. That is a very important consideration. Note that this does
not mean it's the best one on a technical and theoretical or performance
standpoint.
That is an interesting point, and one that I didn't consider. All of
our RHEL systems are built from a local Satellite Server, but we have
bought a few "retail" licenses, for the purposes of support. So, can I
take it that you're stating that if we were to have a problem with an
XFS, or Reiser filesystem, and opened a support case with it, we might
experience some issues? That is an important point, so thanks ... that
does help inform our decision.
A nice simple way to put it is 'We ship it, we support it'.
ext3 is all the things you want IMO :
(a) reliability, (b) performance, and (c) ease of administrative tasks.
. A couple more (d)Long support cycle (e) a good engineering and
maintenance understanding of it from your vendor.
Cheers
Michael
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- From: Sandor W. Sklar
- Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- References:
- Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- From: Sandor W. Sklar
- Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- From: Mike Kearey
- Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- From: Sandor W. Sklar
- Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- Prev by Date: unable to copy dot prefixed files to Apache powered WebDAV shares
- Next by Date: Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- Previous by thread: Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- Next by thread: Re: Preventing ext3 fsck at boot?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|