RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. Besides, if
CentOS is the same as Red Hat, I assume that it too will not have the
driver I need..?

Thanks for the suggestion, though!

Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: 22 October 2007 07:51
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM:

You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is
binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference
(and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the
RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of
RHEL's up2date and the RHN.

I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4
machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported
as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since
CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for
support and updates for CentOS.

See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35
. 8-)

[off-track]
I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast
update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and
came across CentOS and haven't looked back since.
[on-track]

HTH.



Matt,

Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind
of a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose.
I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't
happen
- I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way!
:)


I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's

BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm
pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now.

Will see what the boss says on Monday...

Thanks very much for your reply.

Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can
install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver
support.
Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you
can place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe

create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require

direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to
virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS
which supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual

infrastructure.

Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4

year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it
essential that REHL5 is run on this one?

Just some thoughts for you...

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the
Adaptec web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be
the OEM.


Johan Booysen wrote:
I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server
that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID

2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down

on short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda
does not detect any disks on the server during installation.

Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find
a driver that will work?

Thanks very much.

Johan

--

veritatis simplex oratio est
-Seneca

Andrew Bacchi
Systems Programmer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809

http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/

--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007
9:54 AM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007
9:54 AM


--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Relevant Pages

  • RE: redhat-list Digest, WU-FTPD problem
    ... Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S ... Is it Red Hat Advanced Server? ... can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the RHEL-logos etc ... Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), ...
    (RedHat)
  • RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
    ... You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. ... can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the RHEL-logos etc ... and then see if the driver will load...I'm ... Subject: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S ...
    (RedHat)
  • RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
    ... as I've noticed that CentOS seems to have more device ... Maybe CentOS has more user-centric repos available than RHEL does, ... Subject: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S ... Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Any "gotchas" for D3/Linux 7.5.1 over RHEL5.2
    ... CentOS and it would be in my best interest if TL supported it. ... CentOS is not a supported platform for D3. ... is fully aware that it is based off of the same upline code as RHEL, ... Will they refuse all support calls outright if you mention you're ...
    (comp.databases.pick)
  • Re: Considering going away from Fedora core
    ... I checked Centos and I like it. ... I> support not bleeding edge, but general consumer stuff that's been ... USB hard drives (including memory sticks and many USB digital ... Nothing is stopping you from installing newer RPMs, ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)