RE: redhat-list Digest, WU-FTPD problem

Hi All,

I have a problem with wu-ftpd I cannot upload files that are bigger than
2G I have fc6 Linux.

Please help!

Tnx

Juda
UNIX is user friendly; it is just picky who its friends are!

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 6:00 PM
To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 23

Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: RAS and LiveCD (dbrett@xxxxxxx)
2. Re: RAS and LiveCD (Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin)
3. Query on NTP (Ravi Shanmugam)
4. Re: Query on NTP (Mridul Dutta)
5. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Sorin Srbu)
6. RE: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 21 (Sorin Srbu)
7. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Johan Booysen)
8. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Sorin Srbu)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: dbrett@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RAS and LiveCD
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710211337540.23548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

Thanks to Sorin, this message was getting lost due to a server time
error.

I am resubmitting hoping to get some insite.

thanks
david

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, dbrett@xxxxxxx wrote:

I was looking at buying a RAS, but could not find one I liked at a
price I
could afford. I was deciding to build one from and old computer I had
lying
around. The more I looked into it I though I would build a LiveCD to
do
this. I found a number of sites which talk about how to build LiveCD,
but I
am in need of information on how to build a RAS which windows boxes
can
connect too as well. The second thing I need help on is modifying
LiveCD.

thanks
david




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:00:58 +0800
From: "Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin" <mij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RAS and LiveCD
To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:
<b3d998b00710212000r75b62d0co41d57f03bc24ba1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 1/7/02, dbrett@xxxxxxx <dbrett@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I was looking at buying a RAS, but could not find one I liked at a
price I
could afford. I was deciding to build one from and old computer I had
lying around. The more I looked into it I though I would build a
LiveCD
to do this. I found a number of sites which talk about how to build
LiveCD, but I am in need of information on how to build a RAS which
windows boxes can connect too as well. The second thing I need help
on is
modifying LiveCD.


What do you mean by RAS? Is it Red Hat Advanced Server?

Some good articles on building Live CD,
http://www.livecdlist.com/wiki/index.php/LiveCD_Creation_Resources
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7246

--
Regards,
Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin
Web: http://www.irwan.name/
Blog: http://blog.irwan.name/



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:49:48 +0530
From: "Ravi Shanmugam" <ravi.shanmugam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Query on NTP
To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <6025AF6D092FBF4B8C4813E924C8D7450C45A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

I am using a client which has access to 2 different servers with NTP
deamon running in them.
Can I configure my client to sync the time with these 2 servers like

server server1
server server2

What will happen if both the servers have different time? To what time
my server will sync?

Thanks. Your reply will be very helpful to me.

Regds,
Ravi R.S

SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER
-------------------------
This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information. In
case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you
must not, directly or
indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
message and you are
requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in
this message are
those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing
contained in this message
shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken
Communication
Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent and
with due
authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the
spread of
viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus
transmitted by this email


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:57:11 +0530
From: "Mridul Dutta" <i.mridul@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Query on NTP
To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<a35542d0710212327o14168f5bg247635d0934d1452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

hi ,

TIme server will sync from Primary server.

ex: from server 1


On 10/22/07, Ravi Shanmugam <ravi.shanmugam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I am using a client which has access to 2 different servers with NTP
deamon running in them.
Can I configure my client to sync the time with these 2 servers like

server server1
server server2

What will happen if both the servers have different time? To what time
my server will sync?

Thanks. Your reply will be very helpful to me.

Regds,
Ravi R.S

SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER
-------------------------
This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally
privileged
information. In
case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you
must
not, directly or
indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
message and you are
requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in
this
message are
those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing
contained
in this message
shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken
Communication
Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent
and
with due
authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent
the
spread of
viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage
caused by
any virus
transmitted by this email
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subjectunsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




--
Best Regards

Mridul Dutta

IBM India Pvt Ltd, Embassy Golf Links,
Bangalore.

Email:- mriddutt@xxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:50:34 +0200
From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <D216FFA163A947E7AD65B7FF31210989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM:

You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is
binary
compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference (and the
one I
can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the RHEL-logos etc
stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of RHEL's up2date and
the
RHN.

I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4
machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported
as
long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since CentOS
is
basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for support and
updates for CentOS.

See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35
. 8-)

[off-track]
I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast
update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and
came
across CentOS and haven't looked back since.
[on-track]

HTH.



Matt,

Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind
of
a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose. I
believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't
happen
- I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way!
:)


I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's
BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm
pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now.

Will see what the boss says on Monday...

Thanks very much for your reply.

Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can
install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver
support.
Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you
can
place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe
create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require
direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to
virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS
which
supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual
infrastructure.

Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4
year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it
essential that REHL5 is run on this one?

Just some thoughts for you...

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the
Adaptec
web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be the OEM.


Johan Booysen wrote:
I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server
that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID
2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down
on
short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda does
not
detect any disks on the server during installation.

Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find
a
driver that will work?

Thanks very much.

Johan

--

veritatis simplex oratio est
-Seneca

Andrew Bacchi
Systems Programmer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809

http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/

--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007
9:54 AM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007
9:54 AM


--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:51:53 +0200
From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 21
To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <154EE9EFA1234C98844A58BD171A5CA9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Masamy, Juda (SSO - Rehovot) <> scribbled on Sunday, October 21, 2007
10:57
AM:

What filesystems do you use on your remote and local machine?


I have a problem with wu-ftpd I cannot upload file that is more than
2G
I have fc6 Linux.




------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:08:46 +0100
From: "Johan Booysen" <johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
To: <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "General Red Hat Linux discussion
list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:

<3D48C842BD295548968848572119008C0900E4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. Besides, if
CentOS is the same as Red Hat, I assume that it too will not have the
driver I need..?

Thanks for the suggestion, though!

Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: 22 October 2007 07:51
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM:

You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is
binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference
(and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the
RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of
RHEL's up2date and the RHN.

I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4
machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported
as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since
CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for
support and updates for CentOS.

See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35
. 8-)

[off-track]
I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast
update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and
came across CentOS and haven't looked back since.
[on-track]

HTH.



Matt,

Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind
of a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose.
I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't
happen
- I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way!
:)


I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's

BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm
pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now.

Will see what the boss says on Monday...

Thanks very much for your reply.

Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can
install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver
support.
Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you
can place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe

create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require

direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to
virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS
which supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual

infrastructure.

Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4

year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it
essential that REHL5 is run on this one?

Just some thoughts for you...

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the
Adaptec web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be
the OEM.


Johan Booysen wrote:
I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server
that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID

2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down

on short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda
does not detect any disks on the server during installation.

Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find
a driver that will work?

Thanks very much.

Johan

--

veritatis simplex oratio est
-Seneca

Andrew Bacchi
Systems Programmer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809

http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/

--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007
9:54 AM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007
9:54 AM


--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:25:19 +0200
From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <A36D3EC5077A4D679DBACDC20EEAF0D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Johan Booysen <mailto:johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> scribbled on Monday,
October
22, 2007 10:09 AM:

Not so sure about that, as I've noticed that CentOS seems to have more
device
support. Without going into specifics, I've managed to install CentOS a
while
ago in VMWare server using virtual scsi-drives that RHEL didn't cope
with at
the time. Dito for some physical machines.

Maybe CentOS has more user-centric repos available than RHEL does, which
could
account for more hw-support or something to that effect. I'm speculating
heavily now though. 8-)

Give it a go though, it can't more than fail (it's free as well, so why
hold
back, after all it's a lab-machine right?), and in that case at least
you'll
know it doesn't work with CentOS and will have a reference for the
future.
Only because Oracale isn't certified for CentOS doesn't mean it won't
run. 8-)


I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. Besides, if
CentOS is the same as Red Hat, I assume that it too will not have the
driver I need..?

Thanks for the suggestion, though!

Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: 22 October 2007 07:51
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM:

You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is
binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference
(and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the
RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of
RHEL's up2date and the RHN.

I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our
RHEL3/4
machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is
supported
as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since
CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for
support and updates for CentOS.

See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide:

http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35
. 8-)

[off-track]
I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast
update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while
and
came across CentOS and haven't looked back since.
[on-track]

HTH.



Matt,

Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind
of a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose.
I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't
happen
- I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way!
:)


I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec
adapter's

BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm
pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now.

Will see what the boss says on Monday...

Thanks very much for your reply.

Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can
install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver
support.
Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you
can place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and
maybe

create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not
require

direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to
virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS
which supports your controller - then, include this box in the
virtual

infrastructure.

Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a
4

year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it
essential that REHL5 is run on this one?

Just some thoughts for you...

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S

I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the
Adaptec web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be
the
OEM.


Johan Booysen wrote:
I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server
that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI
RAID

2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track
down

on short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda
does not detect any disks on the server during installation.

Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find
a
driver that will work?

Thanks very much.

Johan

--

veritatis simplex oratio est
-Seneca

Andrew Bacchi
Systems Programmer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809

http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/

--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007 9:54 AM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
10/18/2007 9:54 AM


--

redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




------------------------------

__
redhat-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 23
*******************************************

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    ... CentOS 5.1 isn't that bad as a desktop. ... CentOS for the home server or other unsupported server ... RedHat for a serious server or otherwise when support is needed ... SELinux isn't nearly that hard. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: kde 3.5.8 for fc6?
    ... distribution my server is rock solid. ... In my opinion CentOS doesn't ... support enough hardware to use it on *my* desktops. ... well and CentOS 5.0 is something like a offspring of fc6, ...
    (Fedora)
  • RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
    ... as I've noticed that CentOS seems to have more device ... Maybe CentOS has more user-centric repos available than RHEL does, ... Subject: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S ... Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), ...
    (RedHat)
  • RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
    ... I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. ... Subject: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S ... Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), ... I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: New 64-Bit Server (Centos 4.3, Dual CPU) HORRIBLY SLOW!
    ... I had similar experience with centos 4.4 on dual cpu server; ... failed scsi drives in a raid array. ... Once I removed and replaced the drives, ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)