Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:53:41 -0800
in red hat training class (12/05), we were instructed that we could legally
use the red hat distro while we had a support contract.
once the contract was up, we were obligated to remove the red hat software.
This directly contradicts a statement by RH themselves:
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/renew/faqs/#6
Although perhaps by "red hat software" you meant the RHN code mentioned
at the end of the FAQ.
if you are working for a company/corporation, ask your company legal
department or attorney to interpret the contract.
it is foolish to ask people on this mailing list to give you legal advice;
it is stupid for any one on this mailing list to give you legal advice.
If anything I am looking to facilitate some discussion and perhaps hear
others' experiences on the matter.
Thanks for looking out for me though -- I won't hire redhat-list as my
laywer anytime soon ;)
Ray
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- References:
- Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- RE: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: Sorin Srbu
- Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: hike
- Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- Prev by Date: Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- Next by Date: RE: Port Forwarding
- Previous by thread: Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- Next by thread: RE: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and"redistribution"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
