Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: Fernando Lozano <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:57:05 -0200
Hi Jon,
I am not a lawyer, however I believe that you can - per direction fromThis looks perfectly reasonable and legal, but many times Red Hat people told me (as a customer) that I didn't need entitlements for non-production systems, like a staging server to apply upgades before installing then on production servers, a lab network where we test new firewall rules, or the system where we install a third-party application just to try before buying.
RH legal at the Summit - but IF AND ONLY IF you have *no* currently
subscribed systems. That is the barrier to not being bound to the
subscription agreement, which states 1 machine takes 1 entitlement.
The agreement applies to an entity, not an installation - therefore if
you have even a single subscription, all installations in your
organization require a subscription.
But this may be wrong just as when some says you can't install anything without a valid subscription. :-)
[]s, Fernando Lozano
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- References:
- Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: fernando
- Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: David Tonhofer
- Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- From: Jon Stanley
- Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- Prev by Date: Re: Moving /home to a LVM
- Next by Date: hp dv6636nr Note book RHEL / FEDORA 8
- Previous by thread: Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- Next by thread: Re: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|