Re: NFS + Load Balancer
- From: "Aterea Brown" <aterea.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:38:08 +1300
is nfs the best way to share the files on this partition?
why not use gfs?
if you used nfs you could have a single point of failure in your nfs server.
just my 2c worth.
-art
Greetings :Ali Hamad <ali.hamad34@xxxxxxxxx> 23/02/08 9:34 PM >>>
I'm working on a solution for website that is used mainly for movies
download. The total size of all files are about 5 TB.
I'm going to setup a solution as the following :
1) NAS ( around 6 TB , 12 X 500GB, Raid 1 and 5 ) .
2) 6 web-servers behind a hardware-load-balancer.
All those machines will be running Redhat 5 ... I'm thinking to have
large partition on the NAS and mount it on each one of those web-servers.
My Questions are : Does the Redhat default kernel support exporting such
a large file system ? Would you please share your experince on a
solution like this ?
Thoughts, suggestions and assistance are all highly appreciated,
Regards,
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Prev by Date: Re: question on x windows
- Next by Date: Re: mount Linux directory on Windows
- Previous by thread: RE: NFS + Load Balancer
- Next by thread: regarding gtk+-2.0-devel rpm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
