Re: RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- From: hike <mh1272@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:05:20 -0400
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:52 AM, mark <m.roth2006@xxxxxxx> wrote:
hike wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Rubens Gomes <rubens_gomes@xxxxxxxxxxx><snip>
wrote:
My question is. "Why do you make a separate mount point for /usr?".forced
In the old days of UNIX/SunOS, the hard drives were small and we were
to have separate mount points for /, /var, /usr, /opt, /usr/openwin forto
SunOS, /home. This and the possibility of actually filling a filesystem
100% were the only real reasons for separating the filesystems that I was<snip>
ever given.
As I said in the article I published in SysAdmin last year (before it went
under) on upgrading Linux, you want that so that when you do an upgrade,
you
can rename it, then have a new partition for /usr, and let the install
format
that. That way, a) it's a "clean install", and b) you can fall back with a
few
renames in single user mode.
mark
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Mark,
You just need space for another filesystem if you want to do what you
indicate what the article says and do not, necessarily, need to separate
your filesystems. (Why make things more difficult when they have gone to
all the trouble to simplify our work lives. AND, that's why we do backups.)
By the way, I enjoy how you are always quoting/referring to article. You
must be quite proud of yourself. Funny though, you never tell which issue
of Sysadmin your ariticle was in!
LOL
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- References:
- RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- From: Rubens Gomes
- Re: RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- From: hike
- Re: RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- From: mark
- RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- Prev by Date: Re: RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- Next by Date: pam + cifs + automount
- Previous by thread: Re: RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- Next by thread: Re: RHEL 5 : statically linked shell for root?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|