Renicing and disk usage priority
- From: Kristoffer K*** <Kk***@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 09:13:30 -0500
Hello, all,
I have a server that's running a bunch of processes that I believe are disk bound. The server is an 8-way machine running at about 60% idle, and each process averages about 3% of one processor (they are all single threaded).
Now, I have one of these processes that I need to have running at a higher priority when it comes to disk access. Does renicing a process effect its ability to fight for disk resources, or just processor?
Thanks!
Kris K***
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Renicing and disk usage priority
- From: Chet Nichols III
- Re: Renicing and disk usage priority
- Prev by Date: RE: Specifying multicast interface
- Next by Date: Re: umount /usr busy -- locale-archive ?
- Previous by thread: Specifying multicast interface
- Next by thread: Re: Renicing and disk usage priority
- Index(es):