Re: getent / group / LDAP problem
- From: Pat Riehecky <prieheck@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:33:23 -0500
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 13:51 -0400, Ryan Golhar wrote:
Hi all,
I have RHEL 5 running as an LDAP server, and am trying to configure a
second server to mimic the first one. I have created multiple groups in
LDAP and assigned various users to these groups. On the second server,
running 'id' from the shell doesn't show those secondary groups.
What LDAP product are you using (openldap, FDS, Apache DS, etc)
I thought there might be something wrong with nsswitch.conf, but 'getent
group' is reporting the secondary groups and the users but with a 'x' in
the second field:
RHEL provides a nifty lazy tool system-config-authentication which in my
experience works 100% of the time with LDAP. You may want to give it a
look for the setup bits, it eliminates typos and is all around
successful.
users:x:500:user1,user2,user3
whereas on the first server, I see:
users:*:500:user1,user2,user3
Why the difference in the second field?
This is just different shadow syntax, both of these point the password
field to gshadow, nothing to worry about
'id' doesn't report the secondary groups either. 'id' on the first LDAP
server shows something like:
uid=501(golharam) gid=501(sansuser)
groups=500(users),501(sansuser),85(cvs) context=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t
On the second LDAP server, I get:
uid=501(golharam) gid=500(users) groups=500(users)
context=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t
There should be a second group as 'cvs' with gid=85. Does anyone know
why I wouldn't see secondary groups in my second LDAP server?
This very much depends on how exactly the entry is listed in your ldap database.
Pat
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: getent / group / LDAP problem
- From: Ryan Golhar
- Re: getent / group / LDAP problem
- References:
- getent / group / LDAP problem
- From: Ryan Golhar
- getent / group / LDAP problem
- Prev by Date: Re: umount /usr busy -- locale-archive ?
- Next by Date: Re: pam + cifs + automount
- Previous by thread: getent / group / LDAP problem
- Next by thread: Re: getent / group / LDAP problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|