Re: Alternative to GFS - Cluster Filesystem
- From: Danilo Fantinato <danilofantinato@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:14:02 -0300
It's a Fibrechannel storage, model HP 6000.
NFS is not a solution for me at now.
I'm using the Redhat GFS to mount the filesystems on two machines
simultaneos.
Danilo
2009/8/15 Eugene Vilensky <evilensky@xxxxxxxxx>
--I need to mount a volume of a storage of two servers simultaneously using
HBA.
My initial idea is to use GFS. Is there a safe alternative to cluster
filesystem ?
HBA meaning Fibrechannel storage?
Have you considered NFS over GigE to meet your requirements?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- serial console vs system performance
- From: William Reich
- serial console vs system performance
- References:
- Alternative to GFS - Cluster Filesystem
- From: Danilo Fantinato
- Re: Alternative to GFS - Cluster Filesystem
- From: Eugene Vilensky
- Alternative to GFS - Cluster Filesystem
- Prev by Date: Re: Memory used by oracle
- Next by Date: Clarification regarding Piranha configuration for Squid real servers
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternative to GFS - Cluster Filesystem
- Next by thread: serial console vs system performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|