Re: /etc/redhat-release
- From: inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:07:27 -0500
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Broekman, Maarten
<Maarten.Broekman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Is the "pain point" the libraries that it requires (in particular,
libX11, etc)? Just wondering because the commands that are required
look like what you would expect on any reasonable system.
No, lsb just pulls in various packages that many people don't want on servers.
The "pain point" I mentioned was the inconsistent treatment of
/etc/redhat-release which causes maintenance work for those of us who
do need to parse it in scripts over time. We can expect distinct cases
for each major release of RHEL but there have also been occasions
where this file has changed in unpredictable ways across minor update
levels as well.
John
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: /etc/redhat-release
- From: Stainforth, Matthew (SD/DS)
- RE: /etc/redhat-release
- References:
- /etc/redhat-release
- From: fred smith
- RE: /etc/redhat-release
- From: Broekman, Maarten
- Re: /etc/redhat-release
- From: inode0
- RE: /etc/redhat-release
- From: Broekman, Maarten
- /etc/redhat-release
- Prev by Date: RE: /etc/redhat-release
- Next by Date: RE: /etc/redhat-release
- Previous by thread: RE: /etc/redhat-release
- Next by thread: RE: /etc/redhat-release
- Index(es):